>>6772431 (PB)

Ginsberg and Gorsuch are, in my opinion, correct. Government, as a whole, should get only one shot at a man. It has the power to grind an individual down and exposing him to successive or concurrent prosecutions deprives even a very wealthy man of the ability to defend himself no matter how weak the evidence or how strong his refutation of it. The power of the state must NOT be free to grind a man to dust.

Guys, THIS is what tyranny looks like and I see some of you supporting it. Shame on you. How can you call yourselves conservatives and applaud when the state decrees it "nothing" to grind a citizen into dust?

170 years of precedent does not make a thing morally right, honorable or in keeping with our founding principles … it makes it dusty with age and I am ashamed of the "conservative" justices.

>>6772431 (PB)

Ginsberg and Gorsuch are, in my opinion, correct. Government, as a whole, should get only one shot at a man. It has the power to grind an individual down and exposing him to successive or concurrent prosecutions deprives even a very wealthy man of the ability to defend himself no matter how weak the evidence or how strong his refutation of it. The power of the state must NOT be free to grind a man to dust.

Guys, THIS is what tyranny looks like and I see some of you supporting it. Shame on you. How can you call yourselves conservatives and applaud when the state decrees it "nothing" to grind a citizen into dust?

170 years of precedent does not make a thing morally right, honorable or in keeping with our founding principles … it makes it dusty with age and I am ashamed of the "conservative" justices.

>>6773649 (PB)

When my kids started, they were already at the first grade level and choosing to read by themselves.

Sorry about the other kid, but some parents do the job, others don't. Not my fault if others didn't do their job.

>>6773767

In civil court, his freedom was not in danger. He could not be jailed. The actual wording is: "… nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb …" Neither did the criminal prosecution seek to deprive him of his property, which was the exclusive goal of the civil trial.

Since the civil trial was not a matter of having committed a "capital, or otherwise infamous crime" (ie, he could not be executed nor sentenced to confinement) the standards of evidence and proof were lower … more than that, he was, by then, back on his blood pressure medicine and the glove would have fit.

>>6773342 (PB)

Bow holding her hair.

>>6773353 (PB)

Certifiable dummass. This is probably the second time in his life this guy has ever held a firearm. The other was when the FBI was showing him how the magazine went into the well. They should have had him rehearse it. The magazine release is on the right side of the weapon and the new magazine should be in his left hand … and that fucking sling should be doing something more worthwhile than hanging like an old man's dick.

Head's up, guise … the FBI is not going to get caught out a second time by the (YOU).

Pay attention and don't let a violent post go unanswered.

>>6774392

The FBI? Really? Look about two breads back at the entrapment. Search on /pol/ or FBI.