Anonymous ID: 123e08 June 17, 2019, 4:23 p.m. No.6774756   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4775

>>6774720

 

Wow! Anon!

You are totally going off on your own theory here!

I never said a thing of the sort.

I just provided photos.

If it's just old people eyesโ€ฆI've never seen 'old people' eyes that look like slits.

Nothing to be said here, but that it bares attention to the "why" of things.

Anonymous ID: 123e08 June 17, 2019, 4:30 p.m. No.6774819   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4834

>>6774780

 

So who gives a fuck are those Anons that realize that perhaps there shouldn't be photos or videos of HUMANS with slit eyes, and therefor, look into the reasons WHY it may have occurred!

Genetics? Reptilian DNA? Optical illusions?

The purpose of this board is for TRUTH, not to bash the bearers of information that will eventually lead to TRUTH.

Anonymous ID: 123e08 June 17, 2019, 4:37 p.m. No.6774893   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4912 >>4970

>>6774834

 

I am not saying that at all, YOU ARE SAYING that.

I am saying that if there is observable discrepancies, then one should at least question that which they are observing.

If it is an optical illusion than fine, but if it leads towards something that we don't have in our brain pans yetโ€ฆthen that is what it is.

I am not bashing either side here, I only think we should all approach this subject with an open mind.