>Love you faggots, keep digging.
Love you, too. No homo.
>>6789116 (lb)
I like Andy, but he's been approaching this in a different way than I would. He is spending more time focusing on how many of these features are formed by intense winds. Which is weird coming from a guy who is in the heart of the Electric Universe geology. I see a number of coherent pattern on the surface of the Earth. If anything, I see these patterns affecting our weather, not the other way around.
I'm not saying Steinbacher had this all right either. We're all still trying to figure this one out. At least the ones who are aware of it are. I got really deep into this rabbit hole, last summer, after I finally noticed the scale of it on Earth. If I'm living on this planet, and THIS type of damage happened in the past, I damn sure want to know how it happened. Because, ya know, the WORLD kind of depends on this. No big deal or anything. . .
Thankfully, in all my research one thing I've learned is that most of the claims about "pole flips" or cyclical events are complete BS, due "top scientists" who blatantly misinterpret data, after spending years in indoctrination camps we call "universities", in order to maintain a paycheck, talking about hipster trends. Like "Space-Time" and "What-Not".
I wish I got paid. But I don't. Instead, people stare at me funny for thinking. It's whatever though. It's not like there weren't already of ton of geologists, like Cuvier, that believed there were numerous catastrophes in the past that shaped our Earth.
Point is. Electric Geology is legit! One day the world will understand THE WORLD. Hopefully, I can help (or helped).
Video here is Peter Mungo Jupp. He's an archeologist and one of the moar interesting characters in the Thunderbolts Project crew. He made a cute little series back in the day. He seems to have a decent grasp of a number of these concepts.
http://www.ancientdestructions.com/about/