>>6801557 lb
I'm not sure it's that complicated.
The drone thing probably never happened. But it's cover for whatever we still have left to do there.
The concept of Iran as the "enemy" is a canard and really just refers to leftover Clowns. We're fighting them, but we need not and never will fight the country (i.e. people) of Iran. Just mop up the Clowns.
Clowns out -party over, just like NK.
Yes, it's amazing how we really have been given everything, in some cases decades in advance. And in many cases by our adversaries, no less.
The more I think about it, this whole "muh war could break out any second with Iran because Trump" narrative that has suddenly cropped up, might mean that the window for this possibility has already closed – it's a dead letter, so its safe to use as a distraction. Clowns Out. Strings Cut. We took control.
kek pic saved anyway for future use.
As for mopping up Clownage in Iran. Remember we have it all. Let's not forget that we were the sponsors of all of this fuckery since at least the 70's via the civilian intel community.
Thus, do /ourguys/ know the players, their capabilities, their command structures and weaknesses? For sure. Have they been simultaneously monitoring and starving their supply lines, and tainting what they do let through? Seems likely.
Is/was there fighting? No doubt. Are operators at great risk? Yes. But cutting off the head of the boss snake, after you've starved it awhile, when you know where its den is and what it looks like, and where it goes to eat, probably looks pretty discrete compared to a full frontal invasion.
It's just a guess at the end of the day, but seems logical.
I agree with everything you say here, with one exception. While the U.S. might appear to externally support a "regime change" if it is required for the narrative, I don't think there is anything to be gained by POTUS sending U.S. troops to the capital. I just don't see it being necessary, and I can't see the optics being positive even if it were. There would certainly be better alternatives. Just my $.02 though
Baker, Second Notable
That, my friend, is self-deception.
You don't have that power yourself. It is sufficiently delegated to another.
You may want to consider seeking out who that is.
Before you turned down that sweet, sweet scratch, did you do even a lick of research? Of course you would have.
Since you are so altruistic, would you care to share the sauce with us?
If he's only getting $6,000/year to come on here and spread misinformation, well, Q did say these people are stupid.