>>6802301 PB

I'm not big into the 5g and cell towers and RadioFag stuff although I am knowledgable in MinorRadioFagging. My point was that your sauce proves little.

Showing antenna radiation patterns to prove your point proves nothing at all. The bluetooth on my watch has a radiation pattern. So does a military radar. That doesn't mean my watch is as dangerous as the military radar if I stand 10 feet in front of the sweep as it transmits.

That was my point. You could be spot on about cell towers, I don't have the research nor do I care to go find it. It doesn't interest me. What you didn't have was the sauce to back up what you were saying, thus my comment.

I had a lot of words and they had a point which you missed. What is troubling is that you made an argument and supported it with something that didn't support what you were saying in the least.