>nyt ordered then canceled "abruptly"
Is this the leak?
>>6799266 (pb)
>>6799600 (pb)
>>6799266 (pb)
>>6799600 (pb)
Prove me wrong faggots. Q proof in the Trudeau meeting while Potus was setting the stage. "we'll see what happens". 1 year delta on FF prevented, Iran next Q post. Failing NYT had their editorial board calling out potus ready to go, had to update late. From the Failing New York Times article written by Maggie Haberman
Trump Approves Strikes on Iran, but Then Abruptly Pulls Back
By Michael D. Shear, Eric Schmitt, Michael Crowley and Maggie Haberman
June 20, 2019
WASHINGTON — President Trump approved military strikes against Iran in retaliation for downing an American surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching them on Thursday night after a day of escalating tensions.
As late as 7 p.m., military and diplomatic officials were expecting a strike, after intense discussions and debate at the White House among the president’s top national security officials and congressional leaders, according to multiple senior administration officials involved in or briefed on the deliberations.
<senior administration officials
>Chuck and Nancy celebrated then told that Traitor Brennan
Officials said the president had initially approved attacks on a handful of Iranian targets, like radar and missile batteries.
The operation was underway in its early stages when it was (((called off))), a senior administration official said. Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles had been fired when word came to (((stand down))), the official said.
<called off, stand down
>neither, ff prevented
Asked about the plans for a strike and the decision to hold back, the White House declined to comment, as did Pentagon officials. No government officials asked The New York Times to withhold the article.
>Potus admin wanted article out there
The strike was set to take place just before dawn Friday in Iran to minimize risk to the Iranian military and civilians. But military officials received word a short time later that the strike was off, at least temporarily.
Mr. Trump’s national security advisers split about whether to respond militarily. Senior administration officials said Secretary of State Mike Pompeo; John R. Bolton, the national security adviser; and Gina Haspel, the C.I.A. director, had favored a military response. But top Pentagon officials cautioned that such an action could result in a spiraling escalation with risks for American forces in the region.
Congressional leaders were briefed by administration officials in the Situation Room.
Congressional Democrats emerged from the president’s classified briefing in the Situation Room and urged Mr. Trump to de-escalate the situation. They called on the president to seek congressional authorization before taking any military action.
<urged to de-escalate
>celebrate the habbening
Iran’s ability to target and destroy the high-altitude American drone, which was developed to evade the very surface-to-air missiles used to bring it down, (((surprised))) some Defense Department officials, who interpreted it as a show of how difficult Tehran can make things for the United States as it deploys more troops and steps up surveillance in the region.
Lt. Gen. Joseph Guastella, the Air Force commander for the Central Command region in the Middle East, said the attack could have endangered “innocent civilians,” even though officials at Central Command continued to assert that the drone was over international waters. He said that the closest that the drone got to the Iranian coast was 21 miles.
>we let it get shot down. How would it endanger innocent civilians if it was 21 miles off Iran's coast? If we retaliate ie
FF PREVENTED
1 year delta from Q post
Q
!CbboFOtcZs
20 Jun 2018 - 10:09:03 AM
FF prevented.
Next.
Immigration / chikd separation.
Narrative change critical.
IDEN talking points.
Distract IG report / hearings / Korea.
Iran next.
Regime in trouble.
People awake.
Projection.
These people are sick.
WINNING.
Q
Just noticed nervous Nancy wearing “canary” yellow dress