Interesting, most notably the admission of a "fictitious office". If one fictitious office can exist within the system and be wielded against the citizenry, what others may and have been used?
Interesting, most notably the admission of a "fictitious office". If one fictitious office can exist within the system and be wielded against the citizenry, what others may and have been used?
Agreed. Are you also aware of the sham of Maritime Law and the Courtrooms etc. Also the entirety of Legalese, a Black's Law legal dictionary or Bouvier's Law dictionary is quite revealing.
Indeed so, but remember agreement is part of that. An agreement is a form of contract.
Contracts are only valid/enforceable/honorable/ if both parties are aware and mutually agree. If one party is simply lazy and fails to read the terms that's on them. But if the nature or certain facts of the contract were misrepresented or hidden in part, that is an entirely different beast, with a hunting party not far away. Kind of like our current situation.