Anonymous ID: 878e74 June 21, 2019, 10:16 a.m. No.6807692   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7713 >>7737 >>7757 >>7773 >>7778 >>7779 >>7827 >>7852 >>7903 >>7995 >>8254 >>8278 >>8357 >>8392

>>6806946

 

>Sanctions will be cranked up more than a notch

 

I think anons are missing a key detail in the fog of war here.

 

Last night Trump magically called off the attack on Iran because 150 casualties wasn't proportional. But this is just the cover story โ€“ Trump wasn't going to attack. This was an operation to out the traitors and get them to commit an act of war against the United States in order to stop their hearts in a military tribunal.

 

The weird happy dance we saw Pelosi and Schumer doing outside the WH might be an indicator that (a) they're really stupid and (b) they thought they were going to get their war.

 

Trump's real response is right out there in the open for everyone to see and everyone appears to be missing it. (pic related.)

 

Last night Trump reacted to this incident by imposing new sanctions. On who? On what?

 

Might wanna dig that one up. I think you'll find it is a doosey.

 

CIA runs Iran and the sanctions are killing them. The US doesn't have to fight Iran to remove the CIA. The US only has to weaken the government there enough for the Iranian people to take over. It is like V knocking over the single domino. It is a chain reaction waiting to happen.

Anonymous ID: 878e74 June 21, 2019, 10:36 a.m. No.6807846   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6807827

Possible, but I think it is more likely given all of the attention certain bad actors have been giving Iran that there remain rogue people of influence (Iranian general, for example).

 

Could be. We have a Q but not all of the A's. Yet.

Anonymous ID: 878e74 June 21, 2019, 11:33 a.m. No.6808370   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>6808357

Yes, although the important part of my post was that the sanctions are being largely ignored and are likely crushing. Iran gave Trump the predicate reason to do this, too, so there's no balking over it.