>>6810022

So who is 322?

>>6810022

322 - Obama?

>>6810072

Oh who knows. It was wishful thinking. Why not play a bit?

>>6810067

>>6810086

And implicating Sara Carter.

>>6810147

>>6810152

01:50

and

1004

>>6810201

I'm little red riding hood. Bite me.

Gah. The famefagging.

>>6810220

A simple "who'd have sex with that?" might work.

Although I recognize he needs to be presidential.

>>6810228

Comes with a backdoor tracking device.

Confirmed. Clowns no likely the potential comms breakthrough.

>>6810258

Wasnt there a twitterbater with a handle "neon" something?

>6810274

@neontaster

>>6810349

She's implicated in being in on the manafort/hannity connection.

Geez anon. It's a useful word. She's involved in whatever it is those two are up to in these texts.

>>6810368

>>6810405

Let's change it to Manafort and Hannity talk about Sarah Carter and be done, ok?

You know, words used to be these subtle things. But dumb shit down and we fight over all the wrong stuff.

Shadilay

>>6810465

>https://archive.fo/XmD7P

I know enough to see it, but not solve it. My guess is 3 iterations. 3-6-9

I should've stayed in math.