About now, I'm thinking that:

The drops (all taken together) are the graphic, and the graphic is the map, and the map leads us to a message that is unlocked by the keystone.

Or something along those lines.

At least I don't think the keystone is anything that I previously thought it might have been. Those guesses seem naive (lazy?), when you really take a closer look at the drops. Reminder: when Q is not posting, go back and read drops!

So I collected relevant/connected Q quotes into an image. I think they create a picture that helped my thinking on the question about "what is the keystone."

I only used exact wording from Qin this image. But note they are NOT in context of the drop (maybe that's a good thing, because we are instructed to read EACH SENTENCE). And they are not in any sequence (which might be a bad thing because Q says sequence is important). Anyhow, I'm thinking about things a lot differently right now as a result of this exercize.

(Sidenote: Q says “you have the keystone” (Drop 2633 from Dec 2018). But I can’t help wondering whether we really had the keystone back then, or if that drop confirms some future date when we GET the keystone (think deltas, think future proves past). Think "time." Or at least, I think.

>>6813427

Nope. Q said "dumbs".

Maybe a typo?

I'm not sure I believe Q makes ANY typos though.

I think early on the board lingo refered to "crumb DUMPS" (as in…oh never mind). But that one said "crumb DUMBS".

I do see a typo i made at end of quoting drop 128 though. The word mind shouldn't be there.

>>6813441

Yes I've heard that theory, among many others. I don't think it jives with the drops, personally. I don't think it's solved.

Q warned us that shills pretend puzzles have been solved to stop us from researching. Keystone is NOT solved or you would have unlocked the message of the drops by now. Re-read my graphic. Better yet, re-read Q's "graphic" (i.e., the drops).

>>6813400

This exercise did lead me to conclude that THE MAP is not Dylan Munroe's art project QMapping project though. In fact, now I'm a bit suspicious of Dylan (although his research is amazing and he seems genuine otherwise).

>>6813452

Ya and yet I'm not sure even those typoz that Q claims are "mistakes" after the fact are even actually typos. I presume Q Team is human, so mistakes can happen. And yet…

>>6813476

I think it might be something along those lines, yes. I think it's a key that unlocks the map (the drops) and most importantly THE TIMESTAMPS.

And the News itself is supposed to give us this keystone. At least that's what Q's words suggest on the face of it.

>>6813477

Then it's not the keystone.

>>6813400

Hmmm…could the crumbs be assembled in such a way (arranged according to some element of their timestamps) that they literally create a visual image of something?