Keane and Richardson…
Just your normal everyday Iranians.
BTW there are Iranian Jews and I suspect the majority or at least leadership is comprised of them in this group.
>>Totalitarianism maaaaan
Bravo. Especially the Smedley Butler part. 100% all true. Well done.
He also was the first to officially recognize the (((Bolshevik))) Soviet Union when it was known that they did the Holodomor, Gulags and the Red Terror.
RIP Joseph McCarthy and Charles Lindbergh as well. Add in a good Jew in Benjamin Freedman.
Up is down. Left is right. Mirror.
Franklin D. Roosevelt was a Communist traitor
The Stock Market crash of 1929 was the real take down of The United States
Used as a pretext to officially take the US off the gold standard and forever place Americans in eternal debt
The Smedley Butler plot was a staged event to gain sympathy for Roosevelt's socialist anti American policies
There have been Communists deep within our government for nearly 100 years
Over the years, many true American patriots have been murdered by the traitors
Both General Patton and Secretary of Defense James Forrestal were murdered for discovering the truth
They, along with many other great American families, knew that Roosevelt had betrayed the United States, Conspired with the Soviet Union, and had stabbed our European allies in the back
Millions of Eastern Europeans fought and died alongside the Allies during World War II
Roosevelt repaid their heroism in full by betraying them and handing their homeland over to the Soviet Union, where they would all live under tyranny for the rest of their days
Franklin Roosevelt’s treachery left millions of our western brothers and sisters to be butchered at the hands of the Communists
Had this simply been a matter of incompetence, his crimes could have possibly been forgiven over time
But every single one of his treasonous acts were absolutely with intent
This treason has forever cursed the United States Of America because we engaged the wrong enemies during World War II
Wake Up!
The Culture of Critique is an analysis of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements of Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. The most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty – that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
One of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years – even without a country – has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well -defined national identities. Therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
A remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society’s homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? “I’d rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention.” This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority…
The development of this "diversity" strategy is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. He and his followers – with the notable exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict – were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: “Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”
By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.
The entire “civil rights” movement can be seen as a natural consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, that Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement. Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew. In 1917, when the black separatist Marcus Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization. (They were Jews)
The efforts of Jews were crucial to the “civil rights” transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the American Jewish Congress who claims that “many of these [civil rights] laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into being by Jewish voters.”
While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial equivalence, it was also critical of, “American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and aesthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality). Central to this program was creating ethnographies of idyllic [Third-World] cultures that were free of the negatively perceived traits that were attributed to Western culture.”
The role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.
>>The clock is ticking.
Daily Mail:
The non-Hispanic white population of the U.S. has shrunk for the second year in a row, according to newly released Census data.
In the year through July 1, 2018, the white population decreased by 152,386, while the Hispanic population increased by 1,164,289 and the black population grew by 321,955, according to new population estimates released on Thursday by the Census Bureau.
Asians were the fastest growing racial group on a percentage basis, shooting up 2.63 percent for the year, or an absolute gain of 479,755.
The estimates in population growth, which are updated yearly, are a net figure that includes births, deaths and net migration. The Census does not distinguish how much of the growth is due to migration versus births.
The prior year through July 2017 was the first time that the nation’s white population shrank, a trend that is expected to continue as white birth rates lag behind deaths.
The data shows that the nation’s white population is aging rapidly, and that white Americans continue to delay starting a family.
>>Whites are not even making enough babies to maintain our numbers. There are less of us and more of them, and even more of them are coming our way right now while others are already showing up at the border as you read this.
>>The birthrates are just one part of the problem. The other part of the problem is that America is getting invaded by all kinds of nonwhites.
>>Trying to out-breed these creatures is futile. They just keep coming and we don’t get the kind of aid that they get here because we’re the ones paying for everything. There’s no one to pay for our stuff.
>>If you could ask random Americans from back before the Great Depression why they paid taxes and why they cared about their country, I’m pretty sure none of them would respond “because I want to leave a great country and a strong economy for browns and blacks from all around the world.”
>>The people who made this country great weren’t thinking about the grandchildren of some random brown jungle people when they worked their asses off.
>>It’s beyond disrespectful to throw away their legacy just to avoid being called mean names and dealing with tantrums and the tears of brown kids.
https://cuttingthroughthefog.com/2017/08/19/major-general-smedley-butler-was-a-fraud-and-a-liar/
Butler’s outing of an attempted coup by big business to oust Roosevelt was a publicity stunt designed to make Roosevelt look like the savior of the common man instead of a Wall Street yes-man.
I reckon that if you’re reading this you’ve heard of the so-called “Business Plot,” which is sometimes described as “Wall Street’s Failed 1934 Coup” or “The Banksters’ Fascist Coup.” It refers to the planning of a coup against Franklin Delano Roosevelt by, among others, Morgan and DuPont, which was foiled by Major General Smedley Butler, USMC.
The argument I put forward here is very simple: The plausibility of the Business Plot rests on the assumption that Roosevelt’s policies went against the interests of bankers, industrialists and Wall Street financiers—or at least a very powerful subset of them (including the Morgans and DuPonts who were implicated in the plot). Implied is that his policies were so beyond the pale that he was nearly deposed or turned into a puppet of a fascist government controlled by the likes of J.P. Morgan, Jr. On top of that, we also need to believe that Smedley Butler was the kind of guy who would stand up to the powerful bankers and rat them out due to his “patriotism, integrity, and dedication to democracy.” But at the same time, we need to believe he’s the kind of guy the bankers would approach to lead the coup, even though by then he was already going around giving speeches condemning war profiteers, among them Morgan and DuPont, and exclaiming that “War is a Racket!”
You can see the story is already starting to fall apart under its own internal contradictions before I’ve even started to show that none of these assumptions are true: Roosevelt’s policies were practically dictated by wealthy bankers, Wall Street financiers, and big business; and Smedley Butler was a big fat phony.
The “business plot” was manufactured to make it appear to the public as if Roosevelt’s policies were really for the common good and not a big giveaway to bankers and industrialists. If they hated it enough to depose FDR, then it had to be good, right? By making people believe that a fascist coup was narrowly avoided, it gave the false impression that the country was not already a plutocracy fully controlled by Wall Street.
Now, I realize that all we’ve ever heard about Butler is what an honorable man he was and how much he cared for grunts and regular folk. In the book, The Plot to Seize the White House (you see how that implies the White House was not already seized), Jules Archer describes Butler as “a man of incorruptible character, integrity, and patriotism.” So where do I get off calling him a fraud and a liar?
To answer that, we need to start by questioning the basic logic and sense of this whole story: After retiring from the military, Butler started going around the country giving speeches denouncing the war profiteers and admitting that his career in the Marines was spent as a racketeer for capitalism. But if he was a man of such integrity and incorruptible character, then why was he willing to do the dirty work for them for all those years?
And yet, during all that time, he never had any qualms about it or considered resigning? Given his alleged moral character, this is the least we would expect of him once he realized the orders he was following were wrong. Did he suddenly have a change of heart? A transformative epiphany that what he was doing was wrong? No, not according to him. So what made him suddenly start denouncing his former deeds?
So apparently he would have been against it all along but didn’t realize what was really going on. And we’re just supposed to believe that? He had no idea what he was doing? As a Major General he suspended his mental faculties and just obeyed orders? Imagine he had instead said, “Every day for 33 years I gagged on Morgan’s member and took Rock’s feller from behind. I suspected I was just their whore at that time, but my mental faculties remained in suspended animation. Now I am sure of it.” Would you buy it? I wouldn’t.
Now, as much as I like to think that high ranking military officers really are brain dead, what he says here simply isn’t true.
Then they made a Hollywood movie about this supposed "cabal plot". What a stupid story. As usual the Jonestein types will hem and haw that he was really great.
Same shit as today. The weak right still fall for all the Dems tricks. The (((Jews))) tricks. It's all right there.
Guess what?
That's actually fine with me.
That was a common practice by all sides in the war (except the heinous USSR Gulags) where they were inconvenienced but were otherwise safe.
The problem is the fake and phony "death camp" bullshit that they have based on our entire society on. Myths, half truths and outright falsehoods to the extreme.
Pretty much damn near all of these supposed "death camp" victims in Europe were due to the indiscriminate bombing of the entire continent by the ALLIES.
I've wanted to tell these truths to these simplistic new fag "God wins" types recently…thanks for doing it for me…I think these types haven't even swallowed one red pill much less awake to anything…
You probably think the official story of WWII is legit. BTW what did we just learn about the Constitution?
It doesn't protect you if they don't want it to.
BTW what was the reaction to that irrelevant idiot?
Hitler Hitler Jews Jews Jews Holocaust Holocaust Death Camp Death Camp!!!
Like always. What did we learn?
Fair enough but my point still stands. The Constitution has been re-interpreted by leftist bolshevik.marxist faggots and it didn't protect people then and won't in the future. The replacement foreign population sure as hell won't give a shit about it. It's basically already gone.
Guess who else had a Constitution? The USSR. It's just paper goyim. It's not blood. It's not a nation without it's people.
And again…what was the reaction to AOC? Hitler Jews death camps how dare you shoah Holocaust blah blah blah blah.
Your point is actual mainstream history and was never mentioned. The holohoax is an absolute lie and would dwarf any mention of your suggestion. The naked truth chasing a well dressed lie - so to speak. If you aren't challenging the core depection you are doing it wrong.
Core deception
Here is basically my point. There is no play in that AOC comment situation. It's a tails you lose heads we win scenario. It's best to completely ignore it.
She's irrelevant.
Completely distracts normiecons.
Keeps them from gaining further understanding.
Part of this battle is avoiding fights on the enemies turf. I'm not arguing I'm just talking.
I used to think like this.
It's not Pearl clutching about illegals dude.
We will never convince people to care about Palestine.
We should get them to care about being completely Palestined in their own country.
I live in a situation where I am completely overrun by non whites and it sucks. If the entire country becomes like where I live we will be slaves to Democrats forever.
Sorry but Palestinians have gone way down on my priorities list.
>>Hitler
The "Patriot" and "Truth" movement still have some work to do. Why do you think Revisionists went to jail but Alex Jones became a multi millionaire espousing your "controversial" views?
Some other glasses…
It's the Jews glasses (It is)
America dindunuffin glasses
Everything is a lie (except WWII) glasses
Things got bad after Reagan glasses
Defend Jews AND ONLY Jews glasses
Patriot/Truth movement 1.0 and never advance outside comfort zone glasses
What was Germany before Hitler took power? Weimar? That's what you are going to get here in America. He tried to save the world and almost did. He was the complete opposite of a Commie.
You're diet woke.
You are a patriot movement guy.
A good analogy of you and your ilk would be that you are the cuckservatives in the RINO Globalist vs. Right Wing Nationalist equation by modern day equivalencies.
Goodnight faggot.