>>6814844 This is every bit anons' fault as baker's. Not one person asked for a notable bun? Not one anon noticed there wasn't a baker posting for nearly an HOUR before the end of the bread? No one noticed that the baker-taker had a measly 8 posts? Yeah, baker went AWOL for wutever reason, but it is every bit as much our responsibility to keep it smooooth. And no one did.

>>6815171 Yeah, you fell asleep, but just as you said it shouldn't be the end of the world and it shouldn't cause this much chaos. Was trying to say that in these cases, some one else needs to step up. It is everyone's responsibility - not just the baker's - to 'bake' a good bread.

>>6815337 Anon, I really am on your side. You stepped up when no one else did. You fell asleep. So what? That should not have caused chaos. I should have worded my original posting differently - measly was a bad word choice. Generally I see many more posts from bakers. That's all I meant. Apologies.