>>6815454 LB
just normal brittons doing bloody Brit things
<hums golden greens
<eyethespy is known for good info
No.
Posts are tolerated because
-no stopping anyone from posting what they want
-good to have eyes on what info is being peddled on the twatters
but the fawning and fan clubbing is pure cringe.
Come on anon, he’s just another in a long list of such hacks
<was in notables a lot.
Now that’s funny, good job on the circular logic.
Might even fool the dumbest here.
But it means absolutely nothing else than “some posts were notabled”.
Yes. A lot of posts are.
It sure explains another motive for intense shilling in and around Notables: make them seem more important than they are, and when convenient use appeal to authority.
Nice try.
<shilling against this
I’ve spent 2 posts on it (now 3).
One specifically mentioning no intent to stop you, just stating a different narrative.
The other one destroying your humorous attempt at circular logic appeal to authority of notables being notables.
In this last post, let us complete the trilogy by noticing how quickly accusations of shilling come up when faced with merely a dissonant view from your agenda driven narrative.
Good days, sir. You’ve been amusing, and your responses likely educational for many.
Thanks
It’s also hard to argue it’s TYRANNY when law enforcement enforcing laws flaunted gives forehand warning
Non-Sequitur, that was not our conversation at all.
Educational, as I said.
I also said “good days, sir”, and shall proceed, amused at how much your efforts to drive a narrative only further reveal yourself, and the sad weakness of tactics used to evade and distract.
Might not be the best solution, but it's better than having it outlawed.
It's often more about companionship than actual sex - as in all things human, there are many flavors to it.