dChan
Anonymous ID: 703277 June 22, 2019, 12:12 p.m. No.6817435   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7449

TOTALLY REAL NEWS: Now Iran is Hacking Everyone!

 

They hacking er’eybuddy out der.

 

>>RT:

 

>>Iranian hackers are threatening US computer systems, cybersecurity firms FireEye and CrowdStrike have claimed, just as tensions between Washington and Tehran pulled back from the brink of war.

 

>>“Really, we’re seeing increased cyber activity that seems to be focused on the West,” Adam Meyers, vice president of intelligence at CrowdStrike, told Politico. “In early June, mid-June is when it really started to kick off.”

 

“Meyers,” you say?

 

People like to say “the left can’t meme.”

 

But their memes are just the mainstream media.

 

“Russian hackers” is a leftist meme. Now they’re expanding it. Their memes are terrible, but they have the ability to force them. No one would naturally believe this hacking gibberish. But they just repeat it over and over and over again until the mind breaks down and can’t resist it any longer.

 

That happens, you know.

 

Virtually no one says they trust the media.

 

But they will all repeat these memes. Because now, the media is able to create an entire fake reality, where you are inundated from every angle with the same shitty memes. You end up believing that if you don’t believe, you must be anti-social. It’s a subconscious process where you just break down.

 

That is what all of this Iran war propaganda is. They are attempting to break down people’s psyches, to force them to accept the inevitably of war – even in an era when most people would admit that any individual aspect of the narrative sounds like nonsense.

Anonymous ID: 703277 June 22, 2019, 12:17 p.m. No.6817476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7916

Once again, master-media-manipulator Trump has left the neo-con and Globo warmongers of the government-media complex with a bad case of (pardon by the mild vulgarity here) "blue balls." We are told that Trump's planes were actually "in the air"on their assigned mission to bomb Iranian targets; but Trump, concerned over the potential death toll, pulled them back at the last minute.

 

What's amazing is that the idiot press hasn't caught on to the game yet.

 

From the article:

 

"The abrupt reversal put a halt to what would have been the president's third military action against targets in the Middle East. Mr. Trump had struck twice at targets in Syria, in 2017 and 2018."

 

Now, after having once again established his "carry a big stick" credentials – as he had previously done with his fake attack on Syria and fake threats against North Korea and Venezuela – Trump is perfectly positioned to pacify yet another global hotspot. To repeat what we had already repeated just one week ago, on June 14:

 

"We read this statement (threats against Iran) as all part of the necessary theatrical smoke for concealing what is really happening. Trump will eventually meet with the Iranians to kiss and make-up, exactly as he did with Lil' Kim of North Korea after a similar theater of insults and threats (Rocket-Man, fury & fury etc)."

 

On another note, we cannot help but notice the disgusting double-standard regarding the government-media complex's indignation over Iran's alleged downing of an unmanned American drone (zero loss of life) – versus its callously dismissive attitude over the U.S. Navy's "accidental" 1988 shoot-down of Flight 665 – an Iranian passenger plane. That particular act of murderous negligence claimed the lives of 290 men, women and children – and the family members of the dead never even received a formal apology. Instead, Fake News, led by Sulzberger's Slimes, blamed Iran for "creating the tension" which led to the shoot-down. It wasn't until eight years later, in 1996, as part of a settlement in international court, that the U.S. finally issued a weasly-worded statement of "deep regret" along with some payoff money for the families.

 

In vintage "ugly American" form, just one month after the mass-killing, Vice President and Republican nominee for the upcoming 1988 Presidential Election, George H W Bush, scored many points with the patriotard crowd by defiantly declaring: 'I will never apologize for the United States of America, ever. I don't care what the facts are.'

 

Meanwhile, back in the shitty little state of Israel, warmonger Satanyahoo has declared, via Twitter: "In the last 24 hours, Iran has intensified its aggression against the United States and against all of us. I repeat my call for all peace-loving countries to stand by the United States in its effort to stop Iranians' aggression. Israel stands by the United States on this."

 

Thanks for your support of the good old U.S.A., Bibi. You're a real pal (rolling eyes).

 

We wonder – is this bloody bastard – whose wife just made a plea deal to avoid jail time for corruption, and who himself is facing fraud and bribery charges in Israel – finally realizing now that Trump will not be dragging the United States into war against Iran for the sake of Greater Israel? Wish I could see the look on that filthy swine's face when Trump meets with the Iranians for negotiations one day – hopefully very soon.

Anonymous ID: 703277 June 22, 2019, 12:23 p.m. No.6817520   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6817503

The muzzies want to live with the Jews and the West.

 

The Jews want to live with the muzzies and the West.

 

That’s it. That is the other half of the conflict dynamic.

 

Why?

 

The Culture of Critique is an analysis of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.

 

The intellectual movements of Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. The most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty – that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

 

Celebrating Diversity

 

One of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.

 

Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years – even without a country – has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well -defined national identities. Therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.

 

A remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”

 

He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society’s homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.

 

Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? “I’d rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention.” This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.

 

Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority…

Anonymous ID: 703277 June 22, 2019, 12:57 p.m. No.6817747   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6817736

New York is non white lefty central. Of course they would oppose it you fucking retard. There is no "exposed" here besides you being stupid enough to think this hurts them in any way ya fucking idiot.

Anonymous ID: 703277 June 22, 2019, 1:17 p.m. No.6817862   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6817850

The development of this "diversity" strategy is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. He and his followers – with the notable exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict – were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: “Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”

 

By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.

 

The entire “civil rights” movement can be seen as a natural consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, that Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement. Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew. In 1917, when the black separatist Marcus Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization. (They were Jews)

 

The efforts of Jews were crucial to the “civil rights” transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the American Jewish Congress who claims that “many of these [civil rights] laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into being by Jewish voters.”

 

While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial equivalence, it was also critical of, “American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and aesthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality). Central to this program was creating ethnographies of idyllic [Third-World] cultures that were free of the negatively perceived traits that were attributed to Western culture.”

 

The role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.

Anonymous ID: 703277 June 22, 2019, 1:23 p.m. No.6817912   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6817885

The other side doesn't view them.as traitors but rather heroes. Anybody on Trump's side that doesn't know who the enemy is yet is too stupid to pander to or hold their hands to see.