>>6817400 (pb)
>Pelosi having a hard time letting go of those illegal DemocRat voters?
>
>Will interfere with her drug and sex/child trafficking cash flow?
That's part of it...big cash in that area, but the more important part of why she wants/needs this as with most of these people screaming about "immigration" is, they can't win offices and retain the power holds they currently have without the illegals.
Saved by the glitch? Mic cuts as Joe Biden defends abortion record
COLUMBIA, S.C. — The microphone gave out Saturday as Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden prepared to defend his record on abortion rights. Biden, the vice president under former President Barack Obama, was responding to a question from Kelley Robinson, national organizing director for Planned Parenthood, who asked how he could convince voters that he was sincere about his commitment to abortion rights "given your mixed record" on sexual and reproductive health.
"First of all, I'm not sure about the mixed record part," Biden said. "I've had I have had 100% voting record—" before the mic dropped. When the sound returned, Biden, reading from a notepad, changed the subject to say what he would do if elected president, including codifying into federal law the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. The 1973 ruling legalized abortion across the U.S. for up to fetal viability, which is generally understood to be roughly 24 weeks into a pregnancy.
Biden came under fire this month when he said he supported repealing the Hyde Amendment fewer than two days after his campaign said he supported it. The amendment is a provision included in government spending bills that bans federal funding for abortions except in the cases of rape, incest, or when a woman's pregnancy threatens her life.
Biden, like several other Democrats running for president, has voted in support of spending bills that contain the Hyde Amendment when he was senator. Other Democratic candidates support repealing the Hyde Amendment, and the Democratic National Committee has since 2016 called for its abolishment, saying it gets in the way of low-income women having access to abortion.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/saved-by-the-glitch-mic-cuts-as-joe-biden-defends-abortion-record
Agreed! Nothing more and nothing less.
I believe we should also pay attention to India..Modi visit up coming.
>Aberdeen Proving Ground on Lock Down
Thanks, start scanning to see what other info can be uncovered.
One Person Transported After Being Exposed To Chemical Element At APG
ABERDEEN, MD (WJZ)– Officials at Upper Chesapeake Medical Center say one person was transported to the hospital after being exposed to a chemical element at Aberdeen Proving Ground. The person was decontaminated at the base before being transported to the hospital were they were decontaminated again and are currently listed in stable condition.
There may have been more people exposed to the chemical but they were not in need of transport and medical treatment at Upper Chesapeake Medical Center. UCMC was briefly diverting medical emergencies while dealing with this incident but has since returned to normal operations. WJZ will bring you more information about this incident as it becomes available.
https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2019/06/22/one-person-transported-after-being-exposed-to-chemical-element-at-apg/
Thank you anon..remember none of us knows everything.. but the drops are a good guide to review..just to get some footing on the happenings for better understanding of situations as they arise.
Ex-top CIA official perturbed by John Durham's review of intelligence analysts
A former top CIA official warned of dire consequences from the Justice Department's review of the origins of the Russia investigation. As part of the "investigation into the investigators," U.S. Attorney John Durham's team reportedly wants to talk to at least one senior CIA counterintelligence official and a senior CIA analyst who examined Russia's role in meddling in the 2016 election. The review is not a criminal inquiry, but should Durham find criminal activity he can take prosecutorial action. Top CIA officials are said to be anxious over the federal prosecutor's efforts.
Michael Morell, who was deputy director of the CIA during the Obama administration, said Durham's interest in speaking to a CIA analyst concerns him. "I see no problem with a DOJ review of whether the CIA and other intelligence community agencies lived up to their legal and regulatory responsibilities related to how they handled any information related to U.S. persons — U.S. citizens and U.S. nationals," Morell told CBS News, where he is now a senior national security contributor. "Having said that, I see a DOJ review of whether or not the intelligence analysts made the right call as wholly inappropriate. I cannot ever remember a DOJ review of analysis," Morrell added. "[Durham] and his team have no experience with, or knowledge of, the process of intelligence analysis," Morell said. "He and his team could well impose a law enforcement standard in coming to a conclusion — a much higher bar than exists in the intelligence community for analytic judgments."
American officials say Attorney General William Barr, who is overseeing Durham's efforts and earlier this year riled Democrats when he said "spying did occur" against the Trump 2016 campaign, wants to understand how the CIA coordinated with the FBI and how the agency came to its conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin gave the order to sow discord in the election to help Trump and undermine his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. That effort culminated in the January 2017 release of a intelligence community assessment, commissioned by former President Barack Obama. In that report, the CIA and FBI expressed "high confidence" that Russia sought to boost Trump while the National Security Agency had "moderate confidence."
The Senate and House intelligence committees both reviewed the assessment, revealing a partisan divide. While the Senate panel, known for being largely bipartisan, called it a "sound intelligence product," the House Intelligence Committee was more critical. In 2018, the then-GOP led House panel said most of the assessment's analysis "held up to scrutiny," but noted the judgment about Putin "failed to meet most of the analytic standards set forth in the primary guiding document for [intelligence community] analysis." Democrats on the committee disagreed with that assessment.
Democrats argue Barr's effort is part of a plan to stonewall the public from learning about President Trump' potential obstruction of justice. Upon the conclusion of his Russia investigation, special counsel Robert Mueller laid out 10 instances of possible obstruction but declined to make a determination about whether he should be accused of a crime. "Trump and Barr conspire to weaponize law enforcement and classified information against their political enemies. The coverup has entered a new and dangerous phase," House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said in a tweet after the president gave Barr sweeping powers to declassify documents in the investigation.
Siding with Democrats, Morrell said he feels "strongly" the Justice Department has "NO business" doing a follow-up review of the intelligence community analysis. "It does not have the knowledge & expertise necessary to get the right answers and it could well have a chilling effect across the analytic community," he said in a tweet.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ex-top-cia-official-perturbed-by-john-durhams-review-of-intelligence-analysts
If that is how you want to view yourself, it is of course your prerogative.
Every time they have an event..that is the end result..what a mess. I guess they are too good to clean up after themselves..