>>6818319

>How to RedPill Your Wife

Your thread reveals that you yourself were asleep at the wheel for the last several decades. Because if you had done your due diligence as a Believer, Husband, Father, and Patriot, (before Q), you would have known the Truth a very long time ago, and wouldn't have to be trying to red-pill family members today.

Note to (your)self: Those who are not AWAKE, tend to not listen to people with sleep (sand) still in their own eyes.

Had you not only woke in recent years, you would know that your cookie-cutter instructions are ridiculous and lame (albeit well meant). I have been red-pilling for decades, (before the Matrix). And after the Matrix was released, I immediately adopted the "red-pill" analogy and was using it back in 1999 (because I was "woke" long before the Matrix ever came out).

Every person is different. The only way to wake people is to find that chink in their Theological/World View ARMOR, and then to patiently exploit it. I have literally awakened thousands of people, and every time, the experience and the method is different.

So sorry, anon. I know you mean well. But your methodology is not well thought out, and that is because you yourself have not been awake and doing your job over the last decades.

Moral of the story?

Recently recovered addicts make bad mentors.

>>6818496

>>6818506

>>6818582

>>6818582 >The way to do it is for an anon to step up and just do it as an intel gathering mission. Ask who knows about Q but without any branding. Q followers will respond.

>

>Then, go through the video and count the people and who ack'd Q. This would give a percentage. Also, the process of calling it out would make more people aware of Q.

This has already done before, and without all of the self-promotion. IntheMatrixxx just proved himself a famefag.

If you ain't seen this video, watch it. It is a clear indicator of our numbers, and is very encouraging. The Mockingbird Media are putting on their, "It wasn't me who farted" faces, while simultaneously and continually crapping their pants.

"Make Noise 4 Q"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3u9TJao1Co

>>6818743

Had you said anything of direct value, I would respond to individual statements. But every anon knows about those who are offended and feel the need to label someone as "pissy, arrogant, etc.". You are offended because what I said was truthful, and it also pertained to you.

Same for your fellow panty-waisted noobs who revealed their true SJW nature, who went ahead and got offended FOR the anon I was speaking to….

All three of you faggots pulling the SJW bullshit and acting as if you are defending someone, when in fact it was YOU who were offended because my comments spoke towards your own predicament as well.

>>6818777

>Will you be going on a speaking tour so that the masses may benefit from your woker than thou wisdom?

I was speaking at national conferences and prophecy events well over two decades ago.

Back when you were watching cartoons and still leaving a skid mark in your tidy-whities.

As I think about it, judging from your response, you probably are still leaving that skid mark.

>>6818752

>Look at this self righteous niggerfaggot who's had it figured out all along.

>Looks like you've been doing a stellar job. What a dumb boomer faggot.

"Figured it out all along?" No.

Figured it out a long time ago? Yes.

"Stellar job?" Yes.

Wrote books and produced documentaries to awaken others (way before Youtube)? Yes.

Spoke for literally, hundreds of hours on the "Conspiracy circuits", at national events, and small/large churches for over a decade? Yes.

Dumb boomer faggot? No.

Boomer? Yes.

As dumb as your noobQfaggotass? No.

Needed to be spoon fed by Q? No.

For a bunch of noobs who parrot that "real anons aren't OFFENDED"….You little dicked know-nothings sure seem to talk just as if you are truly offended, taking offense like SJWs for someone who themselves, never bothered to respond.

I guess my comments hit too close to home for you, as they did the anon I was initially addressing.