>>6819612 (lb)

That's how the probability of something decreases as you add more assumptions.

So if you're saying "Maybe A is true and B is true and C is true …" where you what you add at each stage is just a new guess, not new information, then you get lower probabilities at every step.

But if you are adding evidence, new information, not just pure guesses, then the probability increases, because you are saying, "X is made more probable by the observation that A is factually true, and is made more probable by the observation that B is factually true, …" so when you add evidence the probability increases because each bit of evidence provides some new support and doesn't take away any of the support provided by the other supporting evidence.

>>6819728

>>6819913

>>6819936

>>6819954

"I stopped it from going forward at this time" should be "I stopped it from going forward at the time", unless he's telling us that the time of his tweet, 5:58 PM, is something we should be paying attention to.

>>6820088

The "shill" baker said he would need another person to nominate it before he could accept it as notable.

The attempt to portray that baker, who was inexperienced but polite and respectful, as a malevolent shill appears to be quite contrived.

And some of the stuff that was "somehow" lost from the notables was quite suspicious, like the removal of Donald Norcross from the list of corrupt Democrats taking foreign bribes and hiding that information.

He's on the House Armed Services Committee, isn't he?

He might be aware of qresearch, mightn't he?

Is it possible that he would understand the consequences of his corruption being listed in the notables?

He's had an interesting career in politics. It seems that people in the jobs he wants decide to retire days before he takes their job, because the decision not to do so would be bad for their family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Norcross

"On February 4, 2014, South Jersey Congressman Rob Andrews announced he would be resigning from Congress by the end of the month, and he did so on February 18.[10]

Norcross announced his candidacy February 5, and within a week, he was endorsed by every New Jersey congressional Democrat, State Senate President Stephen Sweeney, General Assembly Majority Leader Louis Greenwald, Mayor of Camden Dana Redd, U.S. Senator Cory Booker, and former Governor Jim Florio"

washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/02/04/n-j-democrat-rob-andrews-expected-to-resign-from-congress

"Rep. Rob Andrews (D-N.J.) said Tuesday that he plans to resign from Congress this month to take a job with a Philadelphia-based law firm, a move he said is best for his family."

That's an interesting person you are "inadvertently" defending with your belligerent attacks on the meek and the mild who are trying to do their best.

Your belligerence makes me want to dig a little bit further into Donald Norcross and his brother George Norcross, the "political boss":

"Norcross continues lineage of old-time political bosses

In this day of ubiquitous iconoclasm, it’s sourly refreshing to see someone holding fast to the old-school practices: I refer to George Norcross, who is a thoroughbred political boss in the classic sense of Frank “I am the Law” Hague and his Jersey City political machine.

From ensuring that he, his cronies and business associates have their pockets well-lined through grandstanding moves that purport to show what he’s doing for the public, to single-handedly dictating the moves of single-party government in Camden and Gloucester counties, Norcross acts like a direct descendant of the most egregious of 1930s and 1940s bosses.

Consider these examples of similar bosses’ behavior, detailed in John Gunther’s book, “Inside U.S.A.,” first published in 1947:

• Dictating any and all government moves; see, for example, the pervasive power E. H. Crump held over much of Tennessee and Memphis in particular.

• Intolerance of public criticism; right there with James Michael Curley, the Democrat mayor and boss of Boston.

• Making (or breaking) political careers on only his own say-so"

Hey - George Norcross sounds like a mob boss thug who probably has exactly the same attitude as you do.

It seems he's extracted more than a billion dollars from the New Jersey government for himself and his companies by racketeering and fraud:

https://observer.com/2019/05/nj-politics-digest-democrat-power-broker-under-pressure-over-tax-incentives/

…

>>6820307

It sounds like he's used to getting his way by intimidation:

"Norcross was also the subject of a federal investigation in 2016 where his phones were wiretapped. The wiretapping ended quickly, however, after it became clear that neither Norcross nor the people with whom he works or associates did anything wrong or untoward and was given a clean bill of health. Norcross has been associated with businesses that got special treatment from the Economic Development Authority (EDA). A investigative task force was formed to look into the operations and procedures of the EDA. Norcross's law firm sued the State of New Jersey to try stop the highly critical report from becoming public. After a five hour court hearing about the injunction, Norcross lost and within minutes the report was made public."

"For many years, he has been named one of the most powerful non-elected political figures in New Jersey by the website PolitickerNJ.com. From 2014 through 2019, he was named one of New Jersey's most powerful people by NJBiz.com."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Norcross

Wow. I bet he would be really pissed off if an uncensored board like qresearch revealed that he put his brother onto the House Armed Services Committee using his political muscle for purposes that aren't very noble or altruistic.

Thanks for bringing this guy to our attention.

We'll make sure the US Marine Corps are fully briefed about Donald and George Norcross.

You've done the country a service.

>>6820355

No, I'm saying that the baker who was accused of accepting it as notable never did so. He said that he needed somebody else to nominate it before he could do so.

That's because he didn't understand it and also didn't accept the self-nomination.

That's called upright and honest behavior.

You seem to have difficulty distinguishing between normal behavior and promoting bizarre vector nonsense as something notable.

Nobody has done what you accuse many of doing, apart from the individual posting the strange vector nonsense, with whom you probably have a lot in common.

Maybe he's your brother.