if there were anything true about this there would be much more excitement happening since you posted it yesterday or day before.
posting a pic of your captcha invalidates all your posts.
do whatever you like, it's your shill job. am only pointing out you lose credibility when you do stupid things. we know you're only here to slide the board so whatever. if you're going to be a shill at least try to be good at something.
so you're posting old shit from 2016 hoping for a mini-larp to emerge?
so what's your point?
seems to be a handwavy contrived connection between same old stuck decrypting wikileaks and TOR.
bring results. no results yet. only "mulling".
>No shit nigger.
dur dur dur dur dur
>Supporting context was all that was being provided.
provided by whom, and why ?
>I do, however, find it funny that the best deepweb tor search engine is called notevil
"however" is a synonym for "but", meaning "ignore everything before this" so interesting nonsequitor
>http://hss3uro2hsxfogfq.onion/
the meat of this is that you suggest there is a useful search function "inside" TOR ?
those weren't anons, Shaggy
a rare productive dialogue with apparently live anon! i'm willing to keep asking questions.
"in the blockchain" means something I guess, immutable and check summed and all that.
never used Tor, never used BTC, never used PGP, so no way of knowing if you are truth or larp. teach us all ?