Not a decode, possibly the start of one

Anons, just thinking about the BREAK pic with my morning cup of covfefe. Cue sounds a lot like “key” and a ball can be a stone. Moar on that in a minute.

The next thing I observed in the pic was the placement of the balls in the rack, specifically their number. Here is what I see, relating the color of the ball to its assigned number:

Apex

13

7 – 15

14 – 8 – 5

3 – 10 – 4 – 12

6 – 9 – 2 – 11 - 1

Can anybody make anything out of this? It’s definitely not a regulation rack by any recognized standards, so Imma work under the assumption it’s purposefully done that way.

Back to the keystone. What causes the BREAK? Doing something with the cue ball. If the cue ball is representative of the keystone, and the rack is their plans, it seems reasonable to extrapolate that the keystone is doing something (event or action) with something (the most obvious “something” would be the FISA and declass, but I am not sold on that).

Thoughts here?

>>6822376

Ok, so I posted the #'s thing this bread b/c I just woke up, see you guys have been at it for a while already. Excellent work as always.

Question to jumpstart my look - anybody find anything in the reflection off the cue ball and/or the right-hand pool cue? Haven't seen that info as I'm taking a very quick look back thru…

Tks in adv

>>6822393

I can see how you get to the conclusion that it's a 2nd cue ball, the size of the white area does seem off. I tried to extrapolate the size on what's exposed relative to the position of the white, using the 15, 14 and 10 balls as area references as best I could.

It's def possible the weird ball is a 12 due to the slightly visible very dark (purple) shading, and I think that's what makes the ball look slightly smaller. The white area only, if that's a ball, it doesn't look truly spherical. So I think that it is the 12.

But WTHDIK?

>>6822402

Go get some sleep, dicknose.

Ask a simple question to catch up and you go off with the "slide" bullshit. Are you the utility infielder who never plays?

>>6822427

It seems that way, but by my calc and based on the positioning it is possible for it to be a 12 ball.

If anyone's decoding the #'s it would make sense to run with both possibilities in mind, just to avoid going down the wrong track and missing something, IMO

Not buying that.

The Gyrenes run Camp David. They'd send out an anonymous guy with cash to a place to pick a new set and hand-deliver it after a scan. Maintaining security ain't that hard.

>>6822462

Speakin' of good points…. Didn't even think about that.

>>6822484

No.

Yes, if it's positioned correctly.

Like I said, I can see how both sides arrived at their conclusions, but what throws it in favor fo the 12 for me (I been looking at the original, too) is the fact that the white area is not perfectly spherical visually. It looks a little compressed, as it would be with the edge of a stripe running just into view.

>>6822482

I suppose anything's possible.

But no.

>>6822532

2 number 1 balls? I know the issue is that you can only see yellow, but I don't know of anyone who makes a solid yellow #9 ball. Do you?

b/c that's not a #1 on the yellow ball in the middle, that much is plain.

not giving you shit about it, btw. I looked at that 3 or 4 times before I concluded #9.

>>6822549

IDFK. Still tryin' to decode like everyone else.

>>6822593

Duh, only 1 cup of covfefe so far, I just responded to myself….

Meant >>6822614 to respond to you. Derp moment for me.

>>6822502

Yeah, that striped green in the middle kinda makes the point, doesn't it?

It's spherical geometry and angle of perspective.

Spatial awareness is a thing.