>>6826771
Re Anon on Challenging Shills
''Totally agree: shills should be challenged at every turn at this point in the game.'' Only exception: spam and false charges already widely discredited.
The intensity of the shilling has increased so much that __it is now clear that the goal is not just to hamper our efforts, but to completely destroy this board via unsubstantiated broadsides, glittering generalities, and extreme division-fagging of all kinds.
'''Current shill tactics""":
a. villaining words that we use a lot (expressions like "o7" or "Godspeed") by claiming they're associated with bad actors (bakers unions, C_A, etc.)
b. villanizing symbols so broadly that memetic artists get attacked for being "cabal"
c. claiming that bakers are out to take over, mess up the board, etc ("bakers union" stuff)
d. calling bewbs "given" to bakers porn (we should be ashamed)
e. attacking anons for being sociable ("This is not a chat room!"), for thanking bakers, being emotionally supportive ("muh feelz"), etc. GOOD MORALE matters, just ask any military leader.
f. tracking and targeting specific groups (bakers) and individuals (those who can be id'd to some extent because they perform a specific task). Saying that anything other than 100% anonymity is bad. Not just impractical, but morally bad (impure, not part of the "Q ideal" for anons).
g. generally trying to make anons' experience on this board impossible to bear (scary, unpleasant, shameful, overwhelming, disgusting). Shills have always done this, but they are going full bore now.
———-
WE CANNOT LET SHILLS make us afraid to being ourselves, state our ideas, or express our love and respect for one another freely.
==Challenge every shill. Every damned one of them.'''