>>6827649
>a. villaining words that we use a lot (expressions like "o7" or "Godspeed") by claiming they're associated with bad actors (bakers unions, C_A, etc.)
You do this constantly by calling anons that use "scare quotes" shills.
>b. villanizing symbols so broadly that memetic artists get attacked for being "cabal"
Then dont use the cabal symbols
>c. claiming that bakers are out to take over, mess up the board, etc ("bakers union" stuff)
There is in fact a bakers union and you are one of the top members
>d. calling bewbs "given" to bakers porn (we should be ashamed)
At best they are spam and everyone here for actual research knows it
e. attacking anons for being sociable ("This is not a chat room!"), for thanking bakers, being emotionally supportive ("muh feelz"), etc. GOOD MORALE matters, just ask any military leader.
Thie place is for research not for you to spend 30+ posts on feels
>f. tracking and targeting specific groups (bakers) and individuals (those who can be id'd to some extent because they perform a specific task). Saying that anything other than 100% anonymity is bad. Not just impractical, but morally bad (impure, not part of the "Q ideal" for anons).
You dont want to be tracked then go back to being anon you stupid fuck. You are literally telling anons [autists] to not track patterns.
>g. generally trying to make anons' experience on this board impossible to bear (scary, unpleasant, shameful, overwhelming, disgusting). Shills have always done this, but they are going full bore now
If you cant handle freedom of speech get the fuck out
———-