>>683101

first one is the 5 leakers; other ones coming up (4, 3, 8 or whatever)

>>683096

maybe first one is five O because five leakers; keep eye for news of 4, 2, and 8 and 4

it seems quiet compared to past few days, are the shills waiting for new orders?

>>683349

i dont think it is a person-count, but an entity (like 'CNN' or something)