Anonymous ID: a26edb March 15, 2018, 10:51 p.m. No.682985   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3087

>>682588 last bread

>Wtf does Q mean by KANSAS?

Maybe any, few, many and/or all of those answers are correct?

 

Maybe instead of anons. wasting a shit ton of valuable time & energy bitching over who's got the right answer, any, many and/or all of us can attempt to view Q words (e.g. KANSAS) similar to "strange attractors"?

 

> http:// www.zulenet.com/vladimirdimitrov/pages/SAM.html

STRANGE ATTRACTORS OF MEANING

 

"We navigate through the whirling dynamics of life by making sense of social complexity, which we both create and are created by.

 

Dynamic Semiotics explores the process of making sense of dynamical signs, that is,

signs standing for objects (phenomena, events, processes), which constantly move, change, evolve and transform in the scope of our perceptions.

It is this kind of objects that contrives the fabric of social complexity.

 

The key hypothesis in Dynamic Semiotics says that in the mental space of humans -

the space of our understanding-supporting thoughts and feelings,

there are structures based on forms and forces linked or merged into spatio-temporal units, which make things meaningful.

Complexity and Chaos reveal the dynamic topologies of these meaning-making units.

 

The intension of this paper is to show that the strange attractors emerging out of chaotic dynamics of the thoughts and feelings constantly swarming in the mental space of each individual encapsulate the topologies of the meaning-making units

and offer a key to a unified semiotic and cognitive understanding of meaning. "

>_____

"If everyone's right, there's no one left." - anon.

>Disclaimer: I could be wrong.

>>682811

>>682866

>>682916 How bout we'll both share it with John (RIP) and anon. who originally shared the list.

>>680845

Anonymous ID: a26edb March 15, 2018, 11:09 p.m. No.683087   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3117

>>682985

STRANGE ATTRACTORS OF MEANING cont'd

> http:// www.zulenet.com/vladimirdimitrov/pages/SAM.html

Emergence of New Meanings at the Edge of Chaos

 

"New meanings correspond to new strange attractors brought to life in the mental space of an individual (a group, the society).

 

According to Chaos theory, the spontaneous creation of an attractor happens if systems parameters pass certain critical values.

 

Then the attractor loses its dynamic stability. The region in the phase space where this happen has a specific name: Egde of Chaos.

 

At the edge of chaos, two (or more) strange attractors can simultaneously lose their stabilities and merge to form a new attractor (a phenomenon known as attractor-merging crisis),

or one strange attractor can become suddenly destroyed (a phenomenon called boundary crisis),

or can dramatically decrease/increase its size (folding/expanding interior crisis),

or can split into two or more attractors (attractor-splitting crisis).

 

It is always a kind of magic when an articulated or written word spontaneously 'explodes' with meaning,

IF the language-state of the listeners (or readers) has entered the critical level of its understanding-oriented preparedness to make such 'explosion' happen.

 

From experience we know that one and the same sign (text, formula, piece of music, dance, ritual) can be meaningless for some and full of meaning for others.

 

And even for one and the same person, signs perceived initially as meaningless can become meaningful later. "

Anonymous ID: a26edb March 15, 2018, 11:15 p.m. No.683117   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>683087

In the case of /qresearch/, the Edge of Chaos would be the hour after Q Drops when posts are flying in at warp speed and anons. are spitballin everywhere.

Last Saturday night is a perfect example. Strange Attractor dropping like flies.

Anonymous ID: a26edb March 15, 2018, 11:38 p.m. No.683224   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>683114

>Barlow co-wrote less than 15 songs.

If you can understand how most everyone considers John Perry Barlow the "GD lyricist" when he wrote less than 10% of their songs,

Then you can understand how JPB fits into this story.

 

Add RAW to the mix, and we could most likely figure out the inner workings of the entire modern Op mock- in+"tweety" apparatus enough to hack the code & reverse engineer to shine right back in the slimy faces.

Anonymous ID: a26edb March 16, 2018, 12:19 a.m. No.683367   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Example:

โ†-

Terence McKenna Culture is not your friend

 

"It invites people to diminish themselves & dehumanize themselves by behaving like machines,

meme machines, meme processors of memes passed down from Madison Ave. & Hollyweird and what have you."

(Audience) "How do we fight back?"

"How do we fight back? It's a question worth answering. I think by creating Art (memes). The more Man can create Art, the more he can become incomprehensible to the Machines."

 

JPB held TM in high regard.