>What you imply, however, is that there is some kind of fuckery going on around this, which is absolutely not true.
hard to quote bold face but there it is, a baldfaced bold face denial.
baker kayfabe continues
>there's no reason to make the damn updated pastebin link bold
agreed, that is just pedantry and possibly a symptom of estrogen.
more boldface lame ass excuses
>Bakers often help each other, especially moar experienced bakers helping newer bakers–got much help at the start.
Not true, it was sink or swim, because we assumed most anons had the skills and you either baked adequately or went it down in flames and someone picked it up. none of this tedious baker fawning.
>its all good.
narcissistic tell phrase for "faggot is trying to pull the wool over your eyes."
more of the "it's all good" permaslide
gaybaker, are you the bold face faggot ?
Shills use first person quite a bit more than anons. Wonder why.
self nomination. ten bread penalty.
it is my sacred duty to point out your fakeness. whether or not you agree or change is irrelevant.
my, such a detailed list of after-the-fact approval of baker actions and delegations.
we watch your shit all day, gaybaker persona, three shifts of it. the day is coming when the shill bakers will be starved out, burnt out, unable to drink any more red bull. we will have used every part of the buffalo and capable anons will resume baking.
word salad at it's finest. it's all goober.
>Then you'd better be prepared to back up your allegations with facts, not conjecture.
oh but muh intuition? double standard much? deja vu.
>Those are facts, anon.
yet irrelevant in that are part of your smoke screen.
that "opinion" likely sauced by many months of IP hashes.
the velveeta never expires
you don't want it to fly because you would be a dead bird. it has been done in the past and can be done again. don't push your luck.
logic doesn't work with a psychopath
see you in an hour