>>6829782 (lb)
if you are not a shill than my statement does not apply to you.
so why are you upset?
PS: a lot could have been done on Saturday if certain things were known but we didn't find out the informatin till the end of the day because the shills had supressed the notables.
that made me angry because it was a very emotional story.
Baker fuckery will be noted and shill bakers will get no excuse accepted.
the non-shill bakers will continue to be loved and respected. if there are any.
I don't understand your meme?
Truman held up a paper that said the wrong thing . . .
so your paper says the wrong thing . . .
if you are a leftist, you are a clueless dolt in the meme department.
if you are not a leftist, the meme still sucks because no one like Truman.
ya, this key board.
it should say 'no one likes Truman'
no one likes him now.
of course, you know that I can't really know that. I haven't asked everyone in the world if they like Truman.
yes, back in his day didn't they have them all convinced that someone who would allow the death of 200,000 people when only 100,000 would have been fine, or maybe just 50,000, or possibly only 25,000, or maybe only 12,500 . . .
you get my point.
who likes him now? someone does?
back then, ya, all the people were hypnotized by the democratic party spin machine, and an almost total dictatorship of a tainted press.
inserting yourself into a conversation and not reading the context of it shows me someone is either a shill or triggered this morning.
mind your own business and do your own digs and keep your nose out of other people's comments if you don't at least read through the thread.
your kidding right?
I get the whole 'there people verses our people' point of view. I have relatives who wouldnt exist had it gone the other way.
So ya.
but Truman? You feel all sweet for him?
you sure you aren't trolling me?
you don't give a link
I can't look for it because I know the one you linked to is not a shill.
are you talking about your own post?
what do I mean with that?
it's hard to see if you have no eyes.
an AI bot has no eyes.
they don't see the meme.
so the meme has no eyes.
I give it to them and they don't see that.
but you do so that means you do have eyes.
It says 'there are many kinds of blindness'
soe people are blind to being humble, and they fame fag.
I made that meme to show a fame fag to say 'be humble.' in the case of the one I used it for today I used it because he had a similar meme, with a mask with no eyes.
and 'there are many kinds of blindness' also means "you go on with some topic A when eveyrone else is about topic B " or other cases where someone is blind to the situation: lacking situational awareness.
you do admit you lack a certain humble quality?
You know you always brag here?
that's you.
I accept you as you are.
I so much want to believe that he went off with his purple bag and is OK in a new life with a new identity.
He had so many testimonials, people who knew and loved him a lot. A wife!
it was all a rouse?
I'm good with that as long as the real guy is safe.
I hope so!
Beebo you are awesome! Shine on!
why go to battle with fame-meme-dude?
He's here all the time.
he's harmless and boastful
everyone knows that.
He's not going away.
He seems to need to feel loved.
I know it's annoying given how bad name fagging can be.
leave meme fag alone . . . .
but anyway he's easy to talk to.
many here have confronted him with his namefag ness over time.
He's just a boastful snot nosed person who needs to feel like he's in it.
also pretty sure his stuff is posted by others to pretend to be him.
so cut him some slack after you querry him to your satisfaction just leave him be. Sometimes it's a real person.
yesterday I was here and people were talking about Dan a lot. and I could tell that it was shills trying to get anon to say things.
So I trolled a 'who is this Dan' and . . . then I got a response.
after that I said 'hold on guys, I was trolling as if because I was worried about all the sudden discussion and that I wanted to draw flack from Dan'
meaning 'take the flack and divert it' next thing:
someone posts 'It's me'!
what do you have to say to me?
ah . . .
I told him I thought he's doing a good job!
anyway
Was it really him?
I want to think so but there is no way to know for sure.