Well, we have documented evidence that the FBI and other 3 letters are here and practicing active subversion techniques.
To be fair - everyone is trying to leave their mark on the bread or the people contributing to it - so we are all, to some degree or another, little psy-ops of our own. All people are - we choose our words and mannerisms to try and elicit actions from others. Well, generally speaking, it is our tendency to do so.
Which is why it is often hard to tell who is a shill or who is not a shill. Start saying something about a subject an anon legitimately is passionate about - and poof - a shill joins the fray for one side or the other. Kind of the way it goes.
In an ideal world, anons are all equally disciplined and don't join into topic slides/shilling wars - but when nearly all topics of research are fair game, it's hard to say what is a slide and what is just anons being argumentative.
I say we invite the shills in and red-pill them to the point they shill in red-pill. Which actually seems to be the case in some places - Facebook moderators have been redpilled to the point they have started expressing the same views they are supposed to be censoring. Not huge numbers of them - but some.