>>6833652

>Today the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a federal criminal statute on the grounds that its language is so imprecise that it violates the Constitution.

A bit moar sauce to save a click. From https://reason.com/2019/06/24/kavanaugh-accuses-gorsuch-of-judicial-activism-in-criminal-justice-case/

The case is United States v. Davis. At issue is a federal statute which, in the Court's words, "threatens long prison sentences for anyone who uses a firearm in connection with certain other federal crimes. But which other federal crimes?" That is where the debate over vagueness comes in. The law itself calls for enhanced sentencing in cases involving felonies "that by [their] nature, involv[e] a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense."

And what exactly does that mean? Opinions differ. And therein lies the problem. As Justice Gorsuch pointed out in his majority opinion, "even the government admits that this language, read in the way nearly everyone (including the government) has long understood it, provides no reliable way to determine which offenses qualify as crimes of violence." And "in our constitutional order," Gorsuch observed, "a vague law is no law at all" because it violates the core constitutional requirement that all federal statutes "give ordinary people fair warning about what the law demands of them."

—

In American constitutional law, a statute is void for vagueness and unenforceable if it is too vague for the average citizen to understand or if a term cannot be strictly defined and is not defined anywhere in such law, thus violating the vagueness doctrine. There are several reasons a statute may be considered vague; in general, a statute might be called void for vagueness reasons when an average citizen cannot generally determine what persons are regulated, what conduct is prohibited, or what punishment may be imposed. For example, criminal laws which do not state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable are void for vagueness. A statute is also void for vagueness if a legislature's delegation of authority to judges and/or administrators is so extensive that it would lead to arbitrary prosecutions.[1] Related to the "void for vagueness" concept is the "unconstitutional vagueness" concept (see below).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagueness_doctrine

>>6833725

Violation of a crime? Anon? Violation. of. A CRIME?

How does that work exactly? Which statute are you referencing or is this some low level irony/ shit memeing?

>>6833781

Filtered. Take this bullshit elsewhere. We have patriot shit to do and your cries for attention are better suited to reddit.

Talk to someone (but not me - you're filtered) IRL. Not on the fucking internet anon, take your cheeto dusty, man titted ass out of the house and have a nice rational conversation with someone. Connect. Have a salad. Go for a run. You'll feel better. i promise. Now fuck off fag, I'm doing patriot shit. Get your house in order and come be part of the solution. Unfuck yourself.

>>6833923

Top KEK to you. Please enjoy your trophy.

>>6833957

Moar re: San Jose Murder Suicide

Dispatch Audio via San Jose Mercury News youtube - https://youtu.be/BdrZG2JPplM

—

Article: https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/06/24/listen-san-jose-quadruple-murder-suicide-dispatch-audio/

San Jose police confirmed Monday morning that three women and one man were shot to death by a man who then killed himself at a home on Habbitts Court, in what appears to be a family or domestic conflict, based on emergency calls to police.None of the victims was immediately named by authorities Monday, pending formal identification and notification of their next of kin. Police released a correspondingly grim figure Monday morning: The killings marked the city’s 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th homicides of the year.The suspect was a Vietnamese man in his 60s, and he has no criminal history in Santa Clara County outside of an unspecified charge in 1997 for which details were not immediately available, according to law-enforcement sources and public and court records. Property records list him as an owner of the home where the shootings occurred.His wife and 17-year-old daughter were among several family members who were able to escape the home after the gunfire began, according to witness accounts given to police.The suspect was confirmed dead about 1:25 a.m. Monday. Hours earlier, officers responded to multiple 911 calls about 8:40 p.m. Sunday about a shooting on Habbitts Court, off Umbarger Road near Senter Road.

—

SF Chron Article: https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/Police-investigate-quadruple-murder-suicide-in-14032854.php

Crime scene investigators with the San Jose Police Department discuss letting a resident back into the cul-de-sac of Cramer Circle and Habbits Court in San Jose, where five people died in a quadruple murder-suicide Sunday night.Photo: Gwendolyn Wu /

3of9Emergency responders investigate at a truck on Habbitts Court as they work at the scene of a multiple shooting on Monday, June 24, 2019 in San Jose, Calif. At least five people - including the suspect - have died following what San Jose police are calling a quadruple murder-suicide, which included a standoff that started Sunday night. A quiet cul-de-sac in San Jose turned into a chaotic scene of gunfire and grenades when a man shot four people to death before killing himself in a standoff with police early Monday, authorities said. Police rushed to the neighborhood at around 8:40 p.m. Sunday after receiving reports of a shooting at a house on the 500 block of Habbitts Court. Upon their arrival, officers learned from a man’s wife, daughter and niece — all of whom fled the home — that he had shot several people inside the house and that the victims appeared to be dead.

Tom Nguyen, a resident of the neighborhood, heard flash-bang grenades going off not far from his home on Umbarger Road early Monday. He identified one of the home’s residents as a man in his 60s named Chi who worked in construction. Nguyen said the man lived at the home with his wife.

>>6834045

Anon. While muh filtered fren has popped off with some stupid shit, 9mm rifles have their place. Especially CQB.

EmbassyFags use them b/c 5.56 and 7.62 in CQB is bad news if you have frens on other sides of walls. 9mms much less dangerous and a shit ton less energy even coming out fully auto like in a Colt SMG.

Not the best to reach out and touch someone at the 500 yard line but dangerous weapons in most any situation. Could certainly fuck shit up in the 150 + closer mark. If you have ever fired one the things are nuts b/c they are blowback operated (at least the one I had was) which means there is very little recoil b/s all of the energy is used to push the bolt back to chamber another round. Could literally extend your arm and one hand the rifle in full auto.

>>6834123

Anon. Gotta be faithful with a little before you are trusted with a lot. Go out there and hustle.

>At least I'll put the money to use and physically help people out in life rather than write words on a screen like Q that truth seekers have known for literally fucking decades

GTFO with your I'm better than other shill shit. Find a way to help others. I'm sure Maduro wasn't going to be like the other socialist dictators, until he was. Quit looking for others to subsidize your life and get after it FFS.

>>6834154

How in the fuck are you helping others if you have to get people to subsidize your existence? Manage your own shit so you don't have to come here to digitally panhandle.

Get engaged at the community level. Talk to religious leaders FFS.

>>6834214

>The point went over your simple minded fucking head

You are probably right. A quick search of your posts this bread reveal a lot of fucking noise and virtue signaling. I probably did get it wrong, that is on me.

>>6834123

>>6833921

>>6833859