Anonymous ID: 5277ed June 24, 2019, 7 p.m. No.6834996   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5006 >>5025 >>5027 >>5060 >>5107

>>6834959

Anons – should we believe this narrative, or disbelieve? Is it true, or is Google doing a clever and sophisticated job of damage control? I can't tell. This person sounds authentic, but I don't see any misspellings or grammatical errors. I wonder how long they spent composing it offline and how many Google lawyers, execs, and media relations people reviewed it to ensure it delivers Google's talking points?

 

I'm not sure what to think. I haven't seen the Veritas video.

Anonymous ID: 5277ed June 24, 2019, 7:16 p.m. No.6835123   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5154

>>6835060

I rarely watch videos (busy farming memes I guess) but I do analyze people and their verbal style. And I do have familiarity with how big companies work.

If you think my comment had no value, then scroll on.

Anonymous ID: 5277ed June 24, 2019, 7:20 p.m. No.6835166   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6835107

I'm the (you) (switched IP).

I doubt they're a victim. That was exactly my point in saying it looks composed and it looks like a bunch of Goog corporate geeks had reviewed it before "casually" dropping it here.

You didn't really read my comment all the way through.

BTW I don't use Goog search engine unless nothing else is available.