>>6838726
what kind of shill are you?
you're letting me get away with berating you.
you are 'bored'? why is that my problem?
why are you attending to my posts if they 'bore' you?
quicker? Don't you know anymore putdown techniques?
how can we ascertain what and who you are unless you provide more useless input.
Hurry.
make sure you spell it all correctly.
you don't want to appear to be a hypocrite. Did I spell that wrng?
you know if you are ever confused by anything I type out and speil onward with (in a creative ejection of words and phrases) you can always ask for clarity.
the fact that you haven't read Wittgenstien to the point of understanding, I mean real understanding, of it, say when there are showers in the area, and there are wet parts of the sidewalks, gardening is prohibited because of lightning? maybe not?
you could read some Ludwig, and maybe learn something?
about 'use' of language?
Did I spell his name correctly:
Ludwig Wittgenstein Philosphical Investigations
it's a rather dense read but enlightening. I think the day will come when intellegent people will say 'yes, I did study Wittgenstien, but I can't give you a synopsis.
what did I spell wrong?
why do you care.
hurry hurry.