>>6839069

TYB

little change to make in the dough:

#8745 -→ #8746

>>6839090

Just one moar, baker:

>>6838895,>>6838913 A Russian Warship Is In Havana’s Harbor

>>6839140

just got back, why I didn't reply earlier.

You are correct: "Body too long"

Easiest way to fit moar in notables is to shorten some of the descriptions. See

>>6839602

>>6839619

I should add that I shorten only my own descriptions, not those of other bakers. But experienced bakers tend to use shorter descriptions whenever possible.

>>6839643

Do you mean it's odd that O'keefe/Proj Veritas would "swoop in" to save Shapiro? PV would save anyone who is being targeted unfairly, because the focus is on the group doing the targeting (Google), not the targeted group. Same principle as with Alex Jones, yes?

>>6839558

haven't been following this closely, but know of one "arty party" reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aarti_Party

>>6839640

PV videos are hard to deny. In the future, I imagine companies will be using "deep fake" excuse to say vid's are "deceptive."

>>6839739

Not sure what you're saying anon. Sourcewatch did a "hit piece" on Project Veritas–looking for dirt on them. Didn't find financial irregularities.

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Project_Veritas

If you have additional info, would like to know.

>>6839800

Agree. But other anon brought up possible "fuckery" so I replied. I've noticed negative comments here on PV (anons or shills?). Good to raise questions, get everything out in the open, kek.

>>6839815

>>6839807

not a boatfag, but there exist both SSBNs and SSGNs, just chekeked i out