>Not sure I even want to know how bad it's going to get before enough people wake up.
Like jacking off with toothpaste.
Ah therein lies the locus of the argument. Previous contributions, while appreciated, do not recuse oneself from future requirements.
This clause is necessary to protect the rights of bewb enthusiasts who may or may not have been present and accounted for on said prior revelations.
The judge is duty bound to rule against the defendant in this case and it is the order of the court that photographic evidence of the mammaries be presented to the court forthwith.
Preferably good lighting please.
This a serious matter. Section 38 clause D
requires a pic that has not been previously submitted.
Pro-Boner
Sounds la la bubbles
At such time that the individual is able to make a case by case comparison it will be a moot point.