It's a baby. show some respect.
I understand you captial letter anger.
that's still a little girl or boy dead or used as a prop.
you must understand how hard it is for some people to see such photos? Even if they agree with all that you Red-texted.
no one is 'allowed', we have free speach.
Part of that is using it respectfully. We've seen these pictures enough. That was my point.
It my understanding about big rivers that 'floaters' are common. I've never seen one myself, but I hear it in the news every so often. It's not a pretty sight, nor anything anyone wants to find or to see.
and your behavior is rather curious and almost like a shill in the sense that you have to know that the child and the man are both victims in this (assuming they are really dead).
and yet you act as if you are callus to their plight, when it's the change in the law that we need to protect people like that: so that they won't dare make the trip.
so we change the law to protect them.
your angry is a stupid rouse. You, alone, own your callus disregard for human suffering.
what an asshole thing to do titling it like that.