>https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-422_9ol1.pdf
Good news.
Fabulous gal, our girl /Candace./
Because the constitution says otherwise? To make a change like that might require an amendment.
Trump is making American great again by creating a unified party in a history of the two-party system.
Not a bad idea, but likely difficult to fully execute.
Why not an eagle? Isn't that our national symbol?
Article 1, Clause 3
https://www.brookings.edu/on-the-record/redistricting-and-the-united-states-constitution/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution
BTW, anon is not being sassy. Just conveying what has been taught.
I see your point.
I think that's what SCOTUS concluded. That the constitution limits federal involvement in the lines, even though the constitution demands the concept of representation delivered by measuring population.
Not gonna argue it. Like the way this one went down.
All will be well. The SCOTUS timing of this decision was predictable. No doubt the team planned for either outcome.
Roberts didn't rule against POTUS as much as for sending the question back to the Census Bureau for proper explanation.
Maybe the forms are printed and ready and POTUS is planning to ask for forgiveness instead of permission? Whatever the answer, it's not a big deal.
(((Someone))) is happy for the moment of sharp division, though, on this news.
POTUS could win with 80% of the vote if he'd fix stupid spam phone calls.
Screen caps are handy and worth the extra time as they call attention to your work! Thanks for the get.