>>formalize the chansf or information consolidation all the way through the legislation process.
>Nice, how do we do this and avoid the bureaucratic quagmire that has defined these systems ever since we created these systems?
>>We the people must manage the government
>Exactly, that said, with great power comes great responsibilty. Can we diffuse power through decentralization. If so then how?
I have read most of this site and can't find a reason it isn't possible: sapiocracy.com
Synopsis: a hard-core redux of democracy using technology to aid the process. I'd bet the deliberation process for creating things to vote on might end up containing an environment similar to the chans but refined for productivity instead of ludicrosity.
I'm a computer/software/hardware jack-of-all-trades gurufag and I've read through and thought about the above for years. It is possible but would have to be done very carefully. Critical piece is the self-testing open specification - not just open source. Many nodes in the system have to watch and validate many other nodes constantly. If that's possible then a totally secure distributed network platform can be created. Also of note is that by my read, any democracy could decide to morph into such a system of control simply through new legislation to modify the voting process. In other words, it is an onramp to such a system that is already compatible with all existing democracies/republics.
Intriguing. These things could exist and be reliable. Compared to what the world has tried, they are really, really, really advanced. Once a distributed system is redundant and self-validating enough, it becomes completely fault-tolerant and virtually impossible to compromise.
Note: In my wanderings, there are tons of things out there that are looking at this kind of thing like an app. Fuck that…..this has to be precise and engineered like an airliner. There's no 'fudge' room on the way these things work - it has to be bulletproof.
fuck communism