>>6862552

Under the premise that a woman is in control over their body, lets assume a woman wanted antibiotics for a sinus infection.

Why if she has control over her body enough to kill a baby within it that was put there thru her choice, does she not have the ability to get said medications without first putting her body in the care of a doctor to allow her to have said medication?

And why not self prescribe - who knows you better than you? And who you gonna hurt besides you?

If you are fighting for rights to "own your body" why only to kill babies, why not live up to your stated goal?

Satanism apparently is the answer.

>>6862711

I say let her if she pays for it and it does not hurt anyone but HER if she makes a stupid choice…

Better than what we got now…

You can become opposite gender and get the government to pay for it, and not be considered mental. And kill a baby of course too.

But you cant order antibiotic for yourself…. Without paying a consultant who knows nothing about you.

(I make my own antibiotic personally, just pointing it out)

>>6862780

"There can be only one"

-kek