>>8466695

damn. that's a lot of possibility right there.

It's finally showtime.

Saturday 2020-03-21 is minute 55 on the clock, which includes 2017-11-02 on the mirror line.

>>8491414

Interesting link between Q44 and Q55.

I think most assume that the "Friday Message via Twitter" in Q44 is the twatter phrase listed in Q55, but I've always been suspect of that (i.e. Q55 may not happen on a Friday, and instead, we may get a different message on Friday, or Friday could mean something else entirely).

>>8487833

1 year delta from the Sunday after last Friday at :55

I've been revisiting an old idea I had about interpreting the clock through the lens of the zodiac and came across this pic today which reminded me of the clock rays.

Has anyone done work in this area before?

>>8939590

I suppose I'll take that immediate topic slide as confirmation that I should continue to look into this:

>>8939319

>>8940153

Monitoring your slides on a slow clock bread?

Only 7 minutes this time.

Each slide brings more attention and increases my resolve. Thank you! Keep 'em coming!

>>8939319

>>8941300

Can you expand on this?

>>8950362

>Yes. Fractally.

Thank you. I wish I could say that I fully grok the fractal message, but I'm not there yet. I probably only get 1% of what your trying to say, but the little I do comprehend does align with my resent insights/revelations.

>But that knowledge is unavailable for wilfully ignorant pedovore enablers.

I used to be against gatekeeping in any form, but the more I learn, the more I see why there could be both practical and spiritual reasons for initiation/cost associated with an increase in knowledge.

However, that doesn't make it any less frustrating when searching for Truth and having to wade through the 99% crap to find the pearls.

>>7858511

We largely decided this attempt at the "43 confirmed connections" was a lost cause given that it required Q226 and Q227 to be part of the map whereas Q listed the 43 confirmed connections as of Q225.

However, I have some new data that is making me think twice.

I generated a map that connects drops through their timestamps.

e.g.

Q170 [1:24:02 ET] ==Q124

01:24:02==0124 % 1200 124 > Q124

I generate this map on the first 227 drops.

Imagine my surprise when there were 43 connections.

Is it just a coincidence that on the same day Q says the map has 43 confirmed connections, we see:

- 43 connections to past drops by decoding their timestamps

- 43 connections to trump tweets

- Same number of tweets by trump as drops by Q over this time period