I believe I've decoded the latest q:
Mar 15 2018 22:41:56 (EDT) Q !tripremoved ID: 69fcbf 680795
@[19][1st]
@[3][1st]
The LINK.
[John Perry Barlow]
[2]
[3]
[4]
WE HAVE THE SUB.
HOSTAGE RELEASE.
1000 pieces.
Q
The crumb lines up with this article…
https:// www.businesswire.com/news/home/20130515005488/en/Winners-Announced-2013-Hugh-M.-Hefner-Amendment
DECODED:
@[Norman Lear][1st - marker as 1st amendment?]
@[3][1st - marker, 1st amendement related?]
>The LINK.
Freedom of the press foundation
[John Perry Barlow]Q gave us the first name for free
[Daniel Ellsberg]
[Rainey Reitman]
[Trevor Timm]
Q only listed 4 names here because these 4 names are all EFF related.
>We have the sub
>hostages freed
In the context, I think it means they have the securedrop submission site.
Hostages freed means that the people associated with this organization were held hostage by clowns.
Basis for the above:
https:// medium.com/@AngelFox1/why-would-the-freedom-of-the-press-foundation-turn-on-its-own-founder-3a569d38465a
https:// www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Freedom%20of%20the%20Press%20Foundation
Pay attention especially to the list of links in second article.
I believe most of these guys started out as genuinely good guys leaking what they thought was shit about government overreach.
The retaliation by the deep state was to threaten/infiltrate them.
THAT IS HOW THE RIFT BETWEEN WIKILEAKS AND EFF BEGAN, EFF WAS COMPROMISED!!!
What I think Q is saying is that they have control of the dropbox sub, Snowden and others are free from their hostage situation, and I think that they will activate this mechanism to crush the msm.
If you dig further, the story that emerges is that the whitehats who made dropbox originally died in suspicious circumstances, and to me it seems the ones who are left went along with the coercion employed by clowns.