>>6882303

>Can hardly believe the ETS would make such a blatant misstatement of fact.

>Kind of disappointing, actually.

Be careful who you follow, anon. That guy spread similar disinfo last year around the Singapore summit. Back then he claimed to be an NSA insider. What is it now? DOJ? Keep following and eventually you will see his lies, contradictions and pure bullshit.

It's just sad that these larping twitter douchebags keep popping up here more frequently.

>>6882891

Agreed. I think it is valuable that we discuss the different manifestations of the enemy and study their tactics. But that assumes awareness of what they really are. Too many times there is a lack of this awareness around here and someone needs to point it out. I was myself victim of their persuasive power and know what it feels like. But it's really just another system of control.