>>6882240 (PB)
regarding: >>6881576 Anon decodes Gitmo anons photo
anon kind sir, you did not address the point that 1, the date in the photo is 2018. Second, what "be ready" even means. "Be ready" like the last 100 times? Just sit here and get hopes up and then be disappointed? Like how retarded do I have to be to take "be ready" seriously?
So my original assessment was correct? Your prescribed course of action is sit around and hope that someone does something before the violence escalates further?
Where is the local plan?
To be clear anon, I agree with you completely. I just feel entirely impotent and if you catch me at the wrong time that turns into concern fagging. Not sure what the point of this is and I don't like that feeling.
Did anons ever do any digs on this Bob Lazar stuff?
This woman is talking about q clearances and psychics and remote viewiings that the government was involved with post WW2.
Would be interesting to follow the money in all these things and see where it ends up.