Q,

If mass media is the number one enemy of American, should Anons take the fight to them? Maybe start by eliminating local affiliates and then go up to national level. A coordinated take-down would be a 2 week effort.

(Asking for a friend)

>>6883077

Yep.

That’s what I told her.

>>6883074

To silence it’s voice, crushing the larynx is effective.

>>6883056

Ready… for what?

>>6883155

>>6883155

Do they use 10 year olds for priesthood training in Russia, or are they younger?

>>6883181

Some reputations have been earned.

Poor internal policing within the Church has brought the current climate of mistrust. Not me, but themselves.

>>6883245

Antifa attacks ‘journalists’, and without apparent consequences.

Anons wait. And ‘journalists’ lie and twist and subvert truth. And Anons wait. Because lying to the people is no crime. Will law change? When?

>>6883361

>>6883361

>>6883428

>>6883606

>>6883656

I would never harm anyone.

That ain’t too cool.

Other ways to shut them down (aka eliminate).

>>6883697

It is a sincere question.

Taking out MSM can be done without harm to a single person.

>>6883766

Should lying to the people really be legal?

Many laws protect what is unjust.