(lastbread)
>>688363, disregard
/>>688469 what exactly happened on that date (3/17/2014)?
> Q can throw 2 or 3 seemingly unrelated intel items here and in a half hour we will produce 10 plausable connections, 5 or 6 decent tie-ins to other investigations, and at least one "tits or gtfo".
>In other words, Q has created a plus-sized intelligence agency bullpen with no oversight and no danger of betrayal
This anon gets it.
>What is open source?
Precisely
OR, why not let every possible idea be put on the table, and adult decide for themselves?
Having Q(Team) give anons a high five for every correct answer or take away a gold star for every wrong answer isn't why we're here. This is not a (child's) game.
March 5, 2018
https:// consortiumnews.com/2018/03/05/is-msnbc-now-the-most-dangerous-warmonger-network/
Was my first thought too, i haven't chosen one over the other yet until more is revealed, both are feasible perceptions
W/o stopping violations of 1A from occurring ([19], especially freedom of the PRESS, not the CIA acting as de facto press), and censorship issues [3 working with @Jack], the public doesn't have a fair chance at getting the truth, only more propaganda. It's relevant, even if it's not the "definite" answer.