Anonymous ID: 739fd3 March 16, 2018, 2:59 p.m. No.689013   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>688949

yes i have noticed

name calling is lazy and sloppy

if they have arguments then debunk

but it is a tough topic to support or debunk

amazing lack of actual experiments on basic optics since 1500

really too bog for this forum but it is fair to say Q started it with all the very cryptic posts that claims something no one will believe

Anonymous ID: 739fd3 March 16, 2018, 3:11 p.m. No.689128   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9151

>>689095

no the FE model does account for eclipses

ive seen the models in graphics and lunar and solar eclipses do not debunk FE

in fact some mathfags measured the shadow the moon would create on earth given the nasa distances and sizes and it gig not match what is seen

go figure