>>688257 (previous bread)

FWIW its the anons here who (with good intent) assign importance to certain dates - mostly based on various hypothesis. Q didn't say anything about today per se. Just that booms had occurred (we'll know which ones he's talking about as future proves past) and that booms were nigh on the horizon. Whether that means today or tomorrow who knows.

The problem is when an arbitrary consensus forms in the bread that a specific date will be the silver tuna to blow this whole thing wide open… then when it doesn't happen anons flip when they shouldn't. Q never said 3/16.

Also, as an aside, regarding McCabe… they have till tomorrow to fire him right? Doesn't have to be done today.