As POTUS was dealing and negotiating for high stakes at G20, Again liberal judges are dictating
national policy via the bench. Anons ask why and how? People wonder at how.
Its called three things-sources of DS.
-
[P]
-
Inns of Court [in short- a 'Foundation' front for private societies involving judges]
-
The Syndicate-sworn testimony of Former FBI Senior Special Agent-In-Charge Ted Gunderson
for example:
" The Bureau of Authority (“The Moneybags”). They don’t actually control the syndicate, but they have all the right jobs and connections. So, a judge might have control over the judicial process, but he will answer to a superior in the syndicate. Psychiatrists belong here too. The Moneybags are so-called because they raise a lot of the money. It would be suspicious if big corporations funded groups like this, but they can invest money into front-groups. And the majority of the syndicate’s work is done through completely legitimate fronts. We can tap phone lines and access people’s records from behind government agencies. Usually, these are the guys that go after Enemy Targets. Normally, harassment is organized under several “action policies”. If a target isn’t an enemy, a standard policy is enforced. Low level organizers (the aforementioned “playwrights”) play around with the target for a while and rotate crews
When a target is an “enemy”, the policy doesn’t immediately change, but orders filter down from high-level organizers (usually the Supreme Council) which direct ‘Thespians’ to provoke the target or a similar action, and Moneybags to crack down on them once they get in the way of the system. This is called Mincing, because the thespians lure the “meat” (by making it complain or fight back) into the “mincer”.
sauce:
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=78272
https://inns.innsofcourt.org/
https://kdwn.com/2019/06/29/judge-blocks-trump-from-using-military-funds-for-border-wall/
https://therightscoop.com/breaking-federal-judge-rules-against-house-democrats-in-case-against-trumps-wall-funding/