>>6885014

Speaking of NK…

I was thinking about Q's reference and double reference to ES in this post. In a separate Q post he mentions @Snowden as ES (sorry don't have the link handy). All other times that I can remember he always uses @Snowden.

So it got me thinking…when Q double posts "Why was ES in NK?" I'm assuming he means that BOTH Schmidt and Snowden were in NK.

Here's where it gets spoopy.

@Snowden was hired in 2013 by Booz Allen (NSA). Leaks documents by MAY 2013. Schmidt was in NK JANUARY of 2013!

Question: When Q asks who else was with ES, is he referring to @Snowden being there in Jan 2013, then infiltrating NSA and leaking documents that TOLD TRAITORS now to AVOID DETECTION, while also allowing for a "safe" comms setup in NK??

>>6885065

Fuck. Here's the link.

Let me try this again with the link…

Speaking of NK…

I was thinking about Q's reference and double reference to ES in this post. In a separate Q post he mentions @Snowden as ES (sorry don't have the link handy). All other times that I can remember he always uses @Snowden.

So it got me thinking…when Q double posts "Why was ES in NK?" I'm assuming he means that BOTH Schmidt and Snowden were in NK.

Here's where it gets spoopy.

@Snowden was hired in 2013 by Booz Allen (NSA). Leaks documents by MAY 2013. Schmidt was in NK JANUARY of 2013!

Question: When Q asks who else was with ES, is he referring to @Snowden being there in Jan 2013, then infiltrating NSA and leaking documents that TOLD TRAITORS now to AVOID DETECTION, while also allowing for a "safe" comms setup in NK??