Anonymous ID: aec975 June 30, 2019, 8:31 p.m. No.6886395   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6886297

The simple answer?

No.

 

The more complicated answer?

If you are not much of an electronics/avionics buff, or willing to study the necessary subjects, a detailed explanation is largely wasted because "yeah, but computers can have minds of their own and be hacked!"

 

This is, basically, a series of accelerometers that provides data about motion relative to an axis. You can think of it as a somewhat more sophisticated dimmer switch that works by detecting how a crystal's vibration changes when there is a change in velocity.

 

It's extremely unlikely that this is the cause of plane crashes. It is not absolutely impossible, but you are looking at a device with no capacity for external communication. There would be a number of I/O boards this interfaces with before that I/O is processed by an FPGA and/or series of processors.

 

It's not impossible, theoretically speaking, to interfere with the signal coming from these devices and cause problems for an airplane - but you are talking about a shielded wiring system and substantial variation in implementation between airframes. I would be far more suspicious of the China/Taiwan manufacturers of 95% of all electronics/boards than I would a particular device.

 

Again - it's not impossible, strictly speaking, but it would take far less effort to exploit or create a hole higher up in an aircraft's virtual instruments than it would to try and directly mess with a shielded sensor input. If you are going that route, then you have exhausted most other, more likely angles of attack. And a firmware update could patch out your attempts to meddle.

-AT2

Anonymous ID: aec975 June 30, 2019, 8:48 p.m. No.6886475   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6886200

Ah, so that is what that was about. Wasn't hard to infer, but it does sound more retarded than I was expecting…. I don't know why I was expecting anything else, honestly.

 

>>6886385

Attacks will only increase, anon. I do not think it will devolve into civil war. The majority of society is coming to realize how insane these people are, and wants nothing to do with them. When the media and politicians are falling all over themselves to out-radical each other, it will alienate the reasonable people.

 

Watching Tim Pool, for example, go from cheering for Bernie and Soy to chasing Pepe down a rabbit hole has been rather fascinating to see. It's beginning to happen. As President Trump delivers in terms of peace and stability - the average person is backing down from the insanity of the "left."

 

The key to leadership is being able to establish security. If people know that they can go to sleep or put in their best effort without getting stabbed in the back - then they will remain in the troop.

Anonymous ID: aec975 June 30, 2019, 8:58 p.m. No.6886527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6555 >>6604

>>6886396

Homosexuality is tightly coupled with childhood sexual abuse. When asked when their first sexual experience with another person was, some 60% of homosexuals answered that it occured before the age of 14.

By the time they are 30, over half of all those who identified as homosexual at the age of 18 will no longer identify as homosexual.

 

I generally look at homosexuality as being a reaction to improper social development. As with those who engage in heterosexual promiscuity, homosexual behavior is precipitated by a development of physical intimacy ahead of social intimacy. When a child or young teen learns to be physically/sexually intimate before having developed friends (not just playmates - but the types of friends you have gone through proverbial shit with), then social intimacy is as awkward or private as sexual intimacy is for a normal person.

 

I look at it as they are usually wounded people who need treatment of the core problem - an inability to identify with others and themselves - rather than a parade to try and make them feel good about being wounded.