>>686589
It could be a Massive Array of Internet Disks that would allow Secure Access For Everyone.
It would mean a SAFE Network.
>>686589
It could be a Massive Array of Internet Disks that would allow Secure Access For Everyone.
It would mean a SAFE Network.
Files would be sharded in to multiple pieces, encrypted, and copies multiple times…essentially meaningless information randomly spread around the different computers donating resources to the crowdsourced internet…a serverless internet. The people provide the resources. An autonomous internet.
Tokenize it to incentivize and reward those who donate resources and all that value that gets hoarded in siloed into the Silicon Valley/Clown vision of a perverted reality will get spread to those of us that actually provide the data/value.
The thought is that Bitcoin is a network of money, but it really doesn't solve the deeper problem of censorship, data/information property rights. That is the real value. A decentralized internet solution in the information age is the same solution to the internet problems as it is to the monetary problems of central banking. Two sides of the same coin. We have to link the value of human information to currency rather than oil.
Plus, the tech has been around. The guy who built the largest network architecture for Saudi Aramco is working on it…
His opinion, but I share it, that the tokenization is essential to adoption. Otherwise, there are no incentives…Economics is about incentives…get that right and people will adopt it. They aren't SV asshats. They're Scots. They understand freedom.
Badge?