His atty paid out of his own pocket didn't he? it would be unethical for him to lend to his client except for costs advanced in pursuing litigation, so it seems reasonable to guess that the atty was the one who had the affair
His atty paid out of his own pocket didn't he? it would be unethical for him to lend to his client except for costs advanced in pursuing litigation, so it seems reasonable to guess that the atty was the one who had the affair