"Submission complete."
Sub mission complete?
Sub Mission Complete?
>>5800566
http://www.rachelchandler.us📁
How many 'girls' were waiting for their return to the boat?
Who owned the boat?
What does a 'handler' procure?
Is the 'handler' [one of many] connected to Epstein?
Flight logs reveal many hidden artifacts.
[RC]
Q
-
reading "How many 'girls' were waiting for their return to the boat?
intuitively, we think the girls are waiting for the men's return to the boat. perhaps the girls are waiting for their own return to the boat - to be released.
sorry - forgot image
Yes….the post is not near any other Q drop. No context.
Correction - there are other Q drops near it. It could have to do with @Jack, but I don't see anything near it that would indicate what the 'submission' is.
Do you clean your saxophone?
so not just a 3x3 hash mark. 4 plusses. in a plus. wheels within wheels.
NOT ENOUGH HABBENINFS!
Four days. Stale poo.
Nobody cares.
>Curious as to anons opinion on Q's comment re Hannity?
Hannity is playing his part in this movie. He's being fed information and guided as to how to steer his ship.
Proof that chemistry works.
>idk, anon, i think he's a mental midget who just draws on himself like a child.
I agree, but I think he's telegraphing his position/loyalties to other cabal factions.
I'm not sure Hannity's pen drop event tonight was even relevant. I think Q may have just reacted to the posting about the pen event as a reaction to Hannity in general. It was obvious to me in Dec. '17 that Hannity was receiving insider help. He was literally the only mainstream talking head that was covering the corruption with any veracity at all. That's not an accident.
leave the name and email address blank. if you're paranoid, report your own posts and ask the moderators to delete your posts so bad guys can't easily identify you.
>Q came back pretty quick, about a minute later after anon posted. (Why bother responding if there was no connection?)
Do you know who posted the question about Hannity dropping his pen?
Was it Q?
Is it likely it was Q?
You are watching a movie.
December 21, 2017.
>OMG! WE ARE SO FUCKING FREAKING OUT HERE!
+1
I just want to say that she looks like a stereotypical San Francisco liberal bitch. There. I said it.
Why are you replying to me with that stupid shit?
>white squall incoming
>I've been wondering to myself if some, or a majority of the dirt they got on Epstein, was from Weiners laptop. Imagine the trove of evidence that could be on their if it was truly their, "insurance policy."
The Achille's Heel of this brownstoning control scheme (aka MKULTRA) is that if anyone gets all of the control files, they can instantly take out all of the control subjects. Oops.
Well, this clears it up.
560nm