Anonymous ID: 5037f5 July 9, 2019, 7:14 a.m. No.6965923   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6965698(lb)

>https://twitter.com/GraciesGreenND/status/1148228291389616129

 

"Claim political targeting"

 

That's it. That's their perception of a refuge…but it's nothing but a den made of grass and twigs.

 

There is nothing preventing Law Enforcement from prosecuting anyone simply because they announce their candidacy for a political office. Absolutely nothing. Change my mind.

Anonymous ID: 5037f5 July 9, 2019, 7:38 a.m. No.6966141   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6965868

Big Pharma literally pays for Cable News.

 

That's it.

 

That's the connection.

 

Kill the evil profits of Big Pharma, making us sick and then selling drugs to keep us sick, all under the careful control of the FDA, and you will kill #FAKENEWS

 

Big Pharma Owns The Corporate Media, But Americans Are Waking Up And Fighting Back

 

https://trofire.com/2017/04/11/big-pharma-owns-corporate-media-americans-waking-fighting-back/

 

Via America’s Lawyer:

 

When you tune in to MSNBC, Fox News, or any of the other corporate media machines, you’re probably not going to hear much about the methods in which big pharma is taking advantage of consumers either through price gouging or medical mishaps. The reason for this is because talking about those stories creates a major conflict of interest for the people behind the scenes. Mike Papantonio discusses this with journalist and author Martha Rosenberg.

 

Transcript of the above video:

 

Mike:

According to a 2009 study by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, with the exception of CBS every major media outlet in the United States shares at least one board member with at least one drug company. Let me put it in perspective for you, these board members wake up, they go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take them over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of programming that network is going to air. For those board members who aren’t pulling double duty with a media conglomerate and a big drug company, they still understand that they can’t be honest and objective about big pharma because big pharma pays their bills.

 

Drug companies spend about $5 billion a year on advertising with these corporate media outlets, so when Pfizer or Merck or Eli Lilly, or any of the drug companies, kill or cripple Americans with defective drugs, do you really think these board members are going to allow their story to be told on the air? It can take anywhere from three days to a full week before the media reports on a drug or a medical device recall, if they report at all.

 

In the case of Invokana it took 32 days before television outlets reported a single story involving an FDA warning about the potential problems with the product. The FDA began warning about the extreme dangers of Cook IVC filters as early as 2010 and it took about five years, five years, before television media started reporting that to the public. It’s worth pointing out that in these instances it was only through non-corporate independent media outlets that these stories were told at all. It was the outlets who weren’t being forced, they weren’t being forced to remain silent about the drug industry.